IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gomez-tcpm-ack-pull-00.txt]

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 17 July 2019 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C1312019F for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pQIDjAC3JJ2e for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E896C12009C for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.110] (p548DCE40.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.206.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45pV2H1Qxqz14b4; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:56:07 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAAK044SrftVZEnj1FRQXmfA-XYS-nLshhM8-VgMOTig+E+AEyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:56:06 +0200
Cc: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 585042964.52837-271dbd517440f49c302faef0fa71dbbb
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E60DF897-A846-4D32-852D-B9383AF38761@tzi.org>
References: <bc182c486692df3ecd3caf229703612f.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <CAAK044SrftVZEnj1FRQXmfA-XYS-nLshhM8-VgMOTig+E+AEyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/o2uYQybIcRDrb7YFf-gMb6GEh4g>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gomez-tcpm-ack-pull-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 07:56:12 -0000

On Jul 17, 2019, at 08:58, Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  using a reserved flag is a bit expensive

The option could simply redefine existing PSH as having the AKP semantics.
(And possibly all packets having what used to be the PSH semantics.)
They are close enough anyway…

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email