IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Concluding CUBIC draft (chairs' views)

Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Tue, 28 June 2022 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ncardwell@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565D7C14CF01 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cR41A3s0TUeq for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D2EC14F721 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com with SMTP id i17so20514169qvo.13 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wxNrI/42Fw90t+jkZqDkV9ST5yOeRSh7tFJ2niTMJZY=; b=je0FB5OUZAb8L/couc7DyqgTdImmjtnwTqnzaJG9gC7oFEcXMWrmqE+PS+FCz85qNE nGGBPObACF/kq/Rhw+RiqsEvM0YJc/FWdxDX78MHAxHKRgE55hL7uZIvIvblivn90Qs4 RfTf8kucQITWxlsHQnU+spomi0o1Is+2mCuf+j1VRZDnei87EJdhLd/8mi2X+IpFbZTY yMWp8pSfQB3uJAhRiW+/6KIB6+YfvFF6CEHk9Em6WOB3TTa4cf8NnLUnuWUnyqDfQR1z SVHP6SiFRpinNaNnOG+5e7vWvdZWztbEQb3fOtL7RCgrIYjzw9lQbqzr1KjVSr8IFWGT bzPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wxNrI/42Fw90t+jkZqDkV9ST5yOeRSh7tFJ2niTMJZY=; b=nzEpZ5kB3SGLLpga4A7BAmG0DDExpFuGSx8uPEct8ZkLHufxsQeW/vey9hmygySAKz B2KisugcSYbJb234zCWyFANdDenfzYgO94LxiPpCp/R0OC1cQaw5DMNyDG52DEu5A++U dfPOGJRF/2Ig/AZwhbWFWvcHVHRPCUHhp59U/wis1Jcgo6hbUw6L+b/uCSTaKeMmvk5t IALpYemBv6Kvg20ip6P20JbfPkHGqN8r9o1ZJy/jJm37UQQLqTwTMME0TefvclQinklk XJFBKdssDfkwYl15LuA6lksVJ4kKFazI79ufRQfSav1L2TNSIX89p3yD93fLJI8uAd64 CPRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora81zdS/LyJy2n99gLrHqytf4qgDJ1y3LYxFVglLVEQ8QxiJI6uY xqh81dIFoXdAck0UEB7pSL816ewX14dHer8wD5EY1g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1smYmPgsVg0L9cRD2fhKEKpKWwcSSq9XTR3VMEXI6eIthKPfJ3zIjcFPfN4pLUTHpoOtdstZXMzDNsQVwd2cCI=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5893:0:b0:305:21cd:cf6 with SMTP id t19-20020ac85893000000b0030521cd0cf6mr13933011qta.183.1656431091133; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAK044RuQzLNp-c3Cgd7sjXPRbcr5LyAGoZ87WAyvFJbB5s89g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAK044RuQzLNp-c3Cgd7sjXPRbcr5LyAGoZ87WAyvFJbB5s89g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:44:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CADVnQy=yGLnBQ5T5V3rWh_q6kq3rt76nF_+kW=Dj=fXyG25T-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c896b305e283ea78"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/oK2NDzRVS5PIw-5VWrfr-r3LJQQ>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Concluding CUBIC draft (chairs' views)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:44:53 -0000

This sounds like a good plan. Thanks to the chairs for moving this forward.

best regards,
neal


On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 11:39 AM Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> The chairs had discussed how we can proceed and finalize the cubic draft.
> Here's our current views. We would like to proceed with the draft along
> with them if this looks reasonable to people.
>
> 1. The current consensus of the WG is still publishing the doc as a PS.
>
> 2. If we want to hold the publication, there must be solid evidence for
> the risks in the draft. Otherwise, we will proceed with publishing the doc.
>
> 3. If some people think the current draft needs more explanations or hides
> some facts, please propose some texts. It will be included in the draft
> once the WG agrees.
>
> 4. In any case, the chairs will try to capture the discussion points in
> the write-up for the draft in case further discussions are required.
>     (it will be based on
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Gxiy6iW6vl7bvhIWLwr72OUW6fI/ ,
> but there will be editorial and minor changes)
>
> If you have any comments, complaints, suggestions or else, please let us
> know. Especially when you disagree with them.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Yoshi on behalf of tcpm co-chairs
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>

v2.15.0 | Report a Bug | By Email