Re: [tcpm] Impact on AccECN draft of change from EXP to PS
Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Thu, 12 December 2019 18:39 UTC
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C86120A17; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:39:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNtog6XfVHgs; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:39:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 231941209EA; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:39:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id n12so30773lfe.3; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:39:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Io8VfoTj0+HNGhkop3lbtwZ5P32W0GU4nRTjTVu9yoI=; b=JI3ieBI111ij0dh0G70F+mMf0Glyr/JBaAwrub2r5os1cL/U/yLs87/n53ewsgaGt5 Vmhxx+kG5QNpeolKHYtFR/q3QlXxh0UuOsW9Vf6AHR/d3ohs9ZqqnYLzG7AhOYG8YlBJ FEUWvFb51p5MD9i8D5H0m8oUxYu1U/hXsr20kxLw4lV+Y8wGU7C3s6rBHq8oMmI73coL cyznRFhz9w8kyVEBBk5rjhuVMuZka848U9ZIsnXCWeCaiR0MORO3ZpcvXiJOCHFBT/Lu LISchNr+msa3rn5Eh+WtYLmCiEqtWgwHjDIsapE6VvyX80JipbWWRWOdRov7ij/UHunV JDnw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Io8VfoTj0+HNGhkop3lbtwZ5P32W0GU4nRTjTVu9yoI=; b=k82pPafjE2U/krjiN/U+L/NPUE8f4cWnO1q0y+0Hba2txUP8R+535zMiBDjaS+ZJBY Pw3bWJMR4N2jbMWvm2wAaO+X9D3uDw8Tjf7PCqkMTqTBT94KgF77LnVZDgq2rDbl6sfq 0NFAHrez5RzTzH2Fjtuu21T45zxMqLcEq9a7xycfwq2nIeSTxJjT9Wfba/jC5+QJJEjX 86m2RDWE3O4BBPGLYdGB1+QZJeq9TQlNd1fZ6RVihCNYik54bXVDIRAmZ3ldugK2c/UG W8ayy26vPMU+Qjxs7eI8ViEpofJSLIKKgxNKS82rrKxsquKmCk+Xb97QfsyTE8T+h1gH 8WMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWyGJEiTRHgu4hxl7JSlOImoRcy/icoRkux4sAiE2ODl9RgcwLo Wub4lDyGmzrMDmuGaEj9nvCewWN7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwOiRhB0fdh+hMWbptGKbr1rcbYMOOeLhwvtqcuzBgag6AlSKuFlCTt1Xpu+wx4pK/cGe6gTg==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:420e:: with SMTP id y14mr6704855lfh.145.1576175982402; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:39:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-229-102-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.229.102]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h24sm3439893ljl.80.2019.12.12.10.39.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:39:41 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49c9dfa7-019b-4d16-73f6-8a15c1077c73@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 20:39:40 +0200
Cc: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, "tcpm-chairs@ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BECD2B85-DD4E-4583-B5B0-FF9DDB3F5AB1@gmail.com>
References: <83880058-a057-66bf-24a3-855480b29f00@bobbriscoe.net> <49c9dfa7-019b-4d16-73f6-8a15c1077c73@bobbriscoe.net>
To: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/p3BaKyzENzlqrqHB2hdQt34_AMw>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Impact on AccECN draft of change from EXP to PS
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 18:39:45 -0000
> On 11 Dec, 2019, at 8:43 pm, Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> wrote: > > At IETF-106 there was believed to be rough consensus in the room that AccECN ought to be stds track not expt track. > > I pointed out that we would need to check for that consensus on the list. We can't really move forward with the draft until that has been done. So would it be possible to do a consensus call on the list on that question ASAP? Please put me down in the EXP camp. One justification I have for this is that there are suddenly proposals for substantive and controversial changes to the normative text of the draft, which should not be happening during a call to promote to Proposed Standard. - Jonathan Morton
- [tcpm] Impact on AccECN draft of change from EXP … Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Impact on AccECN draft of change from … Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Impact on AccECN draft of change from … Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [tcpm] Impact on AccECN draft of change from … Jonathan Morton