Archive

At 02:01 a.m. 11/12/2008, Pekka Savola wrote:

>On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Lars Eggert wrote:
>>I think we need others to speak up, so we can come to consensus on 
>>what to do here.
>
>As requested: I think the document is fine just as it is.  This has 
>been going on far too long already and I just wish it was done.
>
>I could also live with re-adding some material, but because that 
>would result in another 6+ months of arguments with the text etc I 
>don't look forward to that option.

FWIW, I fully agree with Pekka.

>I wish someone would write another I-D on implementation and 
>deployment experiences with parallel TCP establishment approaches 
>(maybe someone from Apple could help here).  But I don't think this 
>is something that should be tied to the fate of this draft.

I fully agree with Pekka in this respect, too.

FWIW, I volunteer to work a bit more on the "parallel connections" 
stuff, and getting an I-D published on this (and getting whoever has 
implementation/deployment experience in this involved). But as Pekka 
said, I don't think the soft errors draft should be tied to any of 
this "parallel connections" stuff.

Thanks,

--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

Re: [tcpm] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt