Re: [tcpm] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Fri, 12 December 2008 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CC43A69EC; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:41:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1EA3A69EC for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:41:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z64mLEPkc28p for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:41:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.xmundo.net (unknown [201.216.232.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584533A68CD for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:40:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from venus.xmundo.net (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]) by smtp1.xmundo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4586B66F7; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:40:52 -0300 (ART)
Received: from notebook.gont.com.ar (122-83-231-201.fibertel.com.ar [201.231.83.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by venus.xmundo.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mBC7ebf3006649; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:40:39 -0200
Message-Id: <200812120740.mBC7ebf3006649@venus.xmundo.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:31:05 -0300
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0812110657200.14388@netcore.fi>
References: <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A3C6EEA@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com> <200811121548.mACFmKLY007025@venus.xmundo.net> <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A010748D4@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com> <200812030857.mB38v6ND009886@venus.xmundo.net> <754037F5-4ADA-4A74-A6A0-99EB3ACB5DFD@nokia.com> <200812030935.mB39Z5P5007692@venus.xmundo.net> <B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E85CCB8@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov> <F4C852B0-1D36-4EF8-819F-4BE04A0107BF@nokia.com> <alpine.LRH.2.00.0812110657200.14388@netcore.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:40:51 -0300 (ART)
Cc: "weddy@grc.nasa.gov" <weddy@grc.nasa.gov>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "david.borman@windriver.com" <david.borman@windriver.com>, "Black_David@emc.com" <Black_David@emc.com>, "Eddy, Wesley M. \(GRC-RCN0\)\[VZ\]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

At 02:01 a.m. 11/12/2008, Pekka Savola wrote:

>On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Lars Eggert wrote:
>>I think we need others to speak up, so we can come to consensus on 
>>what to do here.
>
>As requested: I think the document is fine just as it is.  This has 
>been going on far too long already and I just wish it was done.
>
>I could also live with re-adding some material, but because that 
>would result in another 6+ months of arguments with the text etc I 
>don't look forward to that option.

FWIW, I fully agree with Pekka.



>I wish someone would write another I-D on implementation and 
>deployment experiences with parallel TCP establishment approaches 
>(maybe someone from Apple could help here).  But I don't think this 
>is something that should be tied to the fate of this draft.

I fully agree with Pekka in this respect, too.

FWIW, I volunteer to work a bit more on the "parallel connections" 
stuff, and getting an I-D published on this (and getting whoever has 
implementation/deployment experience in this involved). But as Pekka 
said, I don't think the soft errors draft should be tied to any of 
this "parallel connections" stuff.

Thanks,

--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1




_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm