[tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5925 (5672)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 24 March 2019 17:47 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0A0120013 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XHRmqjRoSGJ9 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DE28120005 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 68C7AB82235; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: touch@isi.edu, mankin@psg.com, rbonica@juniper.net, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, ietf@kuehlewind.net, michael.scharf@hs-esslingen.de, tuexen@fh-muenster.de, nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: touch@strayalpha.com, tcpm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190324174743.68C7AB82235@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:47:43 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/qT2t75qWKoa17exMtXyZ6bE6hOo>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 08:27:06 -0700
Subject: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5925 (5672)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 17:47:55 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5925, "The TCP Authentication Option". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5672 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Section: 6.2 Original Text ------------- /* set the flag when the SEG.SEQ first rolls over */ if ((RCV.SNE_FLAG == 0) && (RCV.PREV_SEQ > 0x7fff) && (SEG.SEQ < 0x7fff)) { RCV.SNE = RCV.SNE + 1; RCV.SNE_FLAG = 1; } /* decide which SNE to use after incremented */ if ((RCV.SNE_FLAG == 1) && (SEG.SEQ > 0x7fff)) { SNE = RCV.SNE - 1; # use the pre-increment value } else { SNE = RCV.SNE; # use the current value } /* reset the flag in the *middle* of the window */ if ((RCV.PREV_SEQ < 0x7fff) && (SEG.SEQ > 0x7fff)) { RCV.SNE_FLAG = 0; } /* save the current SEQ for the next time through the code */ RCV.PREV_SEQ = SEG.SEQ; Corrected Text -------------- /* set the flag when the SEG.SEQ first rolls over */ if ((RCV.SNE_FLAG == 0) && (RCV.PREV_SEQ > 0x7fffffff) && (SEG.SEQ < 0x7fffffff)) { RCV.SNE = RCV.SNE + 1; RCV.SNE_FLAG = 1; } /* decide which SNE to use after incremented */ if ((RCV.SNE_FLAG == 1) && (SEG.SEQ > 0x7fffffff)) { SNE = RCV.SNE - 1; # use the pre-increment value } else { SNE = RCV.SNE; # use the current value } /* reset the flag in the *middle* of the window */ if ((RCV.PREV_SEQ < 0x7fffffff) && (SEG.SEQ > 0x7fffffff)) { RCV.SNE_FLAG = 0; } /* save the current SEQ for the next time through the code */ RCV.PREV_SEQ = SEG.SEQ; Notes ----- The SNE values are 32 bits; the current pseudocode used 16-bit masks (0x7fff) instead of their 32-bit equivalent (0x7fffffff). This error was first noted by Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5925 (draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-11) -------------------------------------- Title : The TCP Authentication Option Publication Date : June 2010 Author(s) : J. Touch, A. Mankin, R. Bonica Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5925 (5672) RFC Errata System