Re: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack

Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb@microsoft.com> Sun, 17 November 2019 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <pravb@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DF712008D for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 00:49:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M81EBK98WBSA for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 00:49:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM05-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr730102.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.73.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CCAF12007A for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 00:49:35 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Wjw1v+tBjDuHU/PYeA/vPGoP37ooDMdI186FFDFYU+YjCRJDSuJGoBQwThJXfZ/9yM9iYrDHlxqMlvDDMDdqwkevNlSXZx7eKru0o8U/7sb/e9F5VCQ6HgzA4LQaaGxtFoHV9HnVvEKqBwmGZkQXtd9k0bBx88663kPtbs8Xyq8OQPmwcrkOaxWPgBxZvE/gs6Ef/qwfA5/iR1vtNH0njvQ37ohZxPViduE1BdW9M6+xxqIjpWD5n0CiRfaPzrBJhbf9WfAB1zHbj69BNQiliatkDSQZSuAfvupd+Vr8ncAAjDlrWNeRKZVfmE8fbRKrTlDzd/ZWyu/PqAdRt7/QkQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JBHZ++J4zchhycezy9IUoc3p0cnb4EM1PFthmUaWrN4=; b=Ub0OPIG/0Uw2RJzZIS5rmsAzIp0c5WSeIda9vfE6gj4xwoZ1q0LX09opbGOQorwPQvptRYoLHcnrS35LiG35PziCXVEPpizHIET+lhgz8W4GyctV+YwOt/VCMfSt4DUedF4MVvQMuU8uJF/cb7UOP/6twYKoh8REofo17C7cumfolH+Z+vuxIrBXDP6Quf+AUO3UoCI1Vt+jmDVG5LFIQiSFHYsRfxrIStlUsUj4U7EnulMArevQB1B6sSB/Nc36ofy90JsmiNI6QWKNEhZnqWXyQMPjQxs8SYT7BxoFjQ6FaLnjybNZCY3KBr4GufcfEItomiE377L/TNh5d45h1A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microsoft.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=microsoft.com; dkim=pass header.d=microsoft.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JBHZ++J4zchhycezy9IUoc3p0cnb4EM1PFthmUaWrN4=; b=htuuaLdVjhmzbifayNMFCQavYqo6wXilFMn5mRsEHeHW2lcyUu6EB9F3VB1zFbz5uNezhDy+9F6R5e+VGjxvy1f5Cg9obYuhzDW1sbPJQONpm50CihfE7UJhVF2YEQ4HlmZk9OtomsFz1ShvCbINhd82b8Kuh5qMFxAmqAMrJhU=
Received: from MW2PR2101MB1049.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (52.132.149.13) by MW2PR2101MB1034.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (52.132.149.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2451.13; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 08:49:18 +0000
Received: from MW2PR2101MB1049.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f8d0:bf38:ea25:edfa]) by MW2PR2101MB1049.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f8d0:bf38:ea25:edfa%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2474.011; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 08:49:18 +0000
From: Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb@microsoft.com>
To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
Thread-Index: AQHVl/uYcnGNU5hNWUS9WmrRVSx0B6ePF1Jg
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 08:49:18 +0000
Message-ID: <MW2PR2101MB1049C3BE2424A5C3C58E0B24B6720@MW2PR2101MB1049.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
References: <903982D2-36DE-428D-A7C5-D3C389C95E9A@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <903982D2-36DE-428D-A7C5-D3C389C95E9A@lurchi.franken.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_ActionId=b4c8ee53-5d79-445c-9a19-00001ce927ff; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_ContentBits=0; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_Name=Internal; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_SetDate=2019-11-17T08:47:30Z; MSIP_Label_f42aa342-8706-4288-bd11-ebb85995028c_SiteId=72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47;
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pravb@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:67c:1232:144:d572:6241:e96f:6710]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cc0c0111-5d70-43bf-2bcf-08d76b3b088e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MW2PR2101MB1034:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MW2PR2101MB1034C801045B5E873B580309B6720@MW2PR2101MB1034.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6430;
x-forefront-prvs: 02243C58C6
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(136003)(366004)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(86362001)(8676002)(110136005)(229853002)(6116002)(74316002)(966005)(102836004)(5660300002)(316002)(76176011)(6436002)(53546011)(6506007)(478600001)(22452003)(25786009)(46003)(2906002)(14454004)(7736002)(9686003)(11346002)(33656002)(6246003)(10290500003)(8990500004)(256004)(446003)(7696005)(55016002)(76116006)(486006)(186003)(305945005)(71200400001)(71190400001)(66946007)(64756008)(66476007)(66556008)(8936002)(81156014)(10090500001)(66446008)(6306002)(52536014)(81166006)(99286004)(476003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MW2PR2101MB1034; H:MW2PR2101MB1049.namprd21.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 3U3Rkoakhs2QSAmpX1UGgxMd8+WmqHICkBkmIlVNnUQgj3MGKwpIcCVJTIeOWHSYBm/NU/iOdquFMv1Kiu/LhZsPSe/fuNenmb5TTIWX2b3sDF15iIRV1q+Zl0WjY5oykU8XkVWu+kYucPEhmdp/QIihTU+OB9IRP6FaW1QM4iGuU+ZJG6DokTe0o1fcJSOCjYcg0J6QpBwyuGC8uHNs/wkfR4apOfnm9S/+Dq2sCmjcIoDpVasuekjjLcrWqmJtGVEXgt1OrpiP7g9zUx4Eie4QsrZG7eKVvsyQR0ApCPeWVVDc+gE/ETre8ucuKMfanLK8OrZRUN6HhEEgiZ+69WkH3UVy+z2aAKvBWSdH5DYd/tikV5YxcRwNkE9+hFLJRJ2H9rY+ejIWuROOvcTbqvUVoPwWQYVs++zUFf3FQrOOedM42WTJHxsfA7yvyQ4v
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cc0c0111-5d70-43bf-2bcf-08d76b3b088e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Nov 2019 08:49:18.6532 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: B+mhW67dxSTq0pdlrwGUOf59sIndpMW6s+k67ohz91s2W1RpOFihtA30RWpyyXgXdTLPFsHuxld64ZPVnpBDrgdexqMayAK8RoTOOQDhUcM=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MW2PR2101MB1034
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/qnV4Yz-DIDwdtLWRM2OtiKumw7c>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 08:49:37 -0000

RACK is fundamental enough, subsumes TLP, and has enough implementation and deployment. My vote is for PS status. 

-----Original Message-----
From: tcpm <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>; On Behalf Of Michael Tuexen
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 3:17 AM
To: tcpm@ietf.org Extensions <tcpm@ietf.org>;
Subject: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack

Dear all,

the current intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack is experimental.

The authors have indicated that they think the ID is ready for WG LC.
Before starting that, I would like to bring up the question of the intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack.

Due to the fact that there are at least two independent implementations, there has been substantial testing and also deployment, I would like to ask the working group, if PS is a more appropriate intended status.

Any preferences or opinions?

Best regards
Michael

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ftcpm&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpravb%40microsoft.com%7Cb8a101b2647d43d2721908d7661293b5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637090102918896374&amp;sdata=Opzzv5HV%2FmNrTypK32cTXkuf9jwKoifihf14Wua6aM4%3D&amp;reserved=0