Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06.txt
Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 27 January 2022 08:03 UTC
Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EA53A17B1 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:03:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8La7nFn3RhlE for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 798BA3A17B8 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id v5so1847655qto.7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:02:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=enuDmtYjMAmpNcJzxsF4pnb0c7lfUeHMN92F23cRHcQ=; b=BGByvLOoH9ykVKIn39ay3uchCrs4GTFn/DWTOIg0G/Op3BF0hZlsoFlcfJqDRCY0aR 1VhLJxgSIBbkya2ccGkJJhElFeEomjd+QtuWOQyXUC6iCHwVrL/F6Bzw3/C2t7M2MGUP M7RBxAPELkcvDBIsJmbLKhm3rpD5cHerRqmKI10/VmJmx8qyy1uieYxRHE661X5Scddz 6VvcpZ156r6p0iZ+RWmbYe1JQelpfK2exqx1A1wCD6An4haeK7FhLdFBYlMU8X6XXKcc Y0+rhKRxkhhHoHMShfBluunf4BETjqKbOsOpvlaBP/IiicYw9u7puAoCS85xRgd9rrVW 5o7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=enuDmtYjMAmpNcJzxsF4pnb0c7lfUeHMN92F23cRHcQ=; b=r//cuoKdrUnO6xyLZvcY1c6tcEWHwxYla1wxzhhkrk69BILN5l99G+zqdkZ/Qi/I4F 09Ra2J0nH+TQjYKELKGCgkDkYDVA14K0SeadaNQ9QVxwFZh0ZmCAgcRZM91YSrFfGy3l 1qMOM1qpB4EfQ7UTw27JFESKaaxezcXhxuy3yLlGz1NrPKJaOILNW4bndzknvlgK1IhL 6HqmQ6r6yx5kamtNnnuU50yxaaTGuQ65arnN6bTbHorxkYJwtPJ4klCVbb2IQkkEsxnD sq4zEZf/LKOtGtJDoe8725A+zQMB//yYirCtuAt7jwuRoOdDO9GH+/45++5vCFSVbmXI VRSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kzbDrL2lCscnTCTL3FwJ9zRvOXpqrHemLyW1Jw8AhgQN0YKle A7++wFtOGiZLd7Bp+M7aSBb1io7hcT8RZ8qdO2Wu0gpSrBA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXyMglKOx1Hc7PEoDKQmuM3XSNCW3rIMXORcQRlj4f9cLYiy1/mcyGpKGME42C8M+p4WPw/Pr36sITqGjIGMY=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7457:: with SMTP id h23mr1762539qtr.528.1643270574971; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:02:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164318837039.21788.17451980682651967578@ietfa.amsl.com> <EEA435EC-AAAC-4899-8E94-2D54EDE5F72E@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <EEA435EC-AAAC-4899-8E94-2D54EDE5F72E@eggert.org>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:02:43 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAK044SCF-L9Xmoc1vH=uQAe4k5XyYboamRcyTjSAaveu1uMGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e41fd105d68bbe9c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/rHzQPZDcprSNMzAr7O0KKE8xkzM>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:03:01 -0000
Hi Lars, Thanks for updating the draft. There seems to be lots of discussions and updates. So, if possible, I think it would be great if there's highlights for the major updates. Also, I am wondering if https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/135 has been solved completely. Have we decided to leave this part as it is? We don't need any texts here or are there any future plans? Thanks, -- Yoshi On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 2:50 AM Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote: > Hi, > > this -06 version rolls in all the changes requested during (and after) > WGLC ended. > > I'll leave it up to the chairs to decide if another WGLC is warranted or > the document can progress as-is. > > Thanks, > Lars > > > > On 2022-1-26, at 11:12, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG > of the IETF. > > > > Title : CUBIC for Fast and Long-Distance Networks > > Authors : Lisong Xu > > Sangtae Ha > > Injong Rhee > > Vidhi Goel > > Lars Eggert > > Filename : draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06.txt > > Pages : 35 > > Date : 2022-01-26 > > > > Abstract: > > CUBIC is a standard TCP congestion control algorithm that uses a > > cubic function instead of a linear congestion window increase > > function to improve scalability and stability over fast and long- > > distance networks. CUBIC has been adopted as the default TCP > > congestion control algorithm by the Linux, Windows, and Apple stacks. > > > > This document updates the specification of CUBIC to include > > algorithmic improvements based on these implementations and recent > > academic work. Based on the extensive deployment experience with > > CUBIC, it also moves the specification to the Standards Track, > > obsoleting RFC 8312. This also requires updating RFC 5681, to allow > > for CUBIC's occasionally more aggressive sending behavior. > > > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis/ > > > > There is also an HTML version available at: > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06.html > > > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06 > > > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org: > :internet-drafts > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tcpm mailing list > > tcpm@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm >
- [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06.… internet-drafts
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis… Vidhi Goel
- [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Vidhi Goel
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Markku Kojo
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Yuchung Cheng
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Markku Kojo
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Vidhi Goel
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Markku Kojo
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Markku Kojo
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Vidhi Goel
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Lars Eggert
- [tcpm] Proceeding 8312bis draft (Re: 2nd WGLC for… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] Proceeding 8312bis draft (Re: 2nd WGLC… Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] Proceeding 8312bis draft (Re: 2nd WGLC… Vidhi Goel
- Re: [tcpm] Proceeding 8312bis draft (Re: 2nd WGLC… Yuchung Cheng
- Re: [tcpm] Proceeding 8312bis draft (Re: 2nd WGLC… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [tcpm] Proceeding 8312bis draft (Re: 2nd WGLC… Martin Duke
- Re: [tcpm] Proceeding 8312bis draft (Re: 2nd WGLC… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [tcpm] Proceeding 8312bis draft (Re: 2nd WGLC… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Markku Kojo
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Markku Kojo
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Markku Kojo
- Re: [tcpm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis Markku Kojo