Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06.txt

Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 27 January 2022 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EA53A17B1 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:03:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8La7nFn3RhlE for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 798BA3A17B8 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id v5so1847655qto.7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:02:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=enuDmtYjMAmpNcJzxsF4pnb0c7lfUeHMN92F23cRHcQ=; b=BGByvLOoH9ykVKIn39ay3uchCrs4GTFn/DWTOIg0G/Op3BF0hZlsoFlcfJqDRCY0aR 1VhLJxgSIBbkya2ccGkJJhElFeEomjd+QtuWOQyXUC6iCHwVrL/F6Bzw3/C2t7M2MGUP M7RBxAPELkcvDBIsJmbLKhm3rpD5cHerRqmKI10/VmJmx8qyy1uieYxRHE661X5Scddz 6VvcpZ156r6p0iZ+RWmbYe1JQelpfK2exqx1A1wCD6An4haeK7FhLdFBYlMU8X6XXKcc Y0+rhKRxkhhHoHMShfBluunf4BETjqKbOsOpvlaBP/IiicYw9u7puAoCS85xRgd9rrVW 5o7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=enuDmtYjMAmpNcJzxsF4pnb0c7lfUeHMN92F23cRHcQ=; b=r//cuoKdrUnO6xyLZvcY1c6tcEWHwxYla1wxzhhkrk69BILN5l99G+zqdkZ/Qi/I4F 09Ra2J0nH+TQjYKELKGCgkDkYDVA14K0SeadaNQ9QVxwFZh0ZmCAgcRZM91YSrFfGy3l 1qMOM1qpB4EfQ7UTw27JFESKaaxezcXhxuy3yLlGz1NrPKJaOILNW4bndzknvlgK1IhL 6HqmQ6r6yx5kamtNnnuU50yxaaTGuQ65arnN6bTbHorxkYJwtPJ4klCVbb2IQkkEsxnD sq4zEZf/LKOtGtJDoe8725A+zQMB//yYirCtuAt7jwuRoOdDO9GH+/45++5vCFSVbmXI VRSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kzbDrL2lCscnTCTL3FwJ9zRvOXpqrHemLyW1Jw8AhgQN0YKle A7++wFtOGiZLd7Bp+M7aSBb1io7hcT8RZ8qdO2Wu0gpSrBA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXyMglKOx1Hc7PEoDKQmuM3XSNCW3rIMXORcQRlj4f9cLYiy1/mcyGpKGME42C8M+p4WPw/Pr36sITqGjIGMY=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7457:: with SMTP id h23mr1762539qtr.528.1643270574971; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:02:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164318837039.21788.17451980682651967578@ietfa.amsl.com> <EEA435EC-AAAC-4899-8E94-2D54EDE5F72E@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <EEA435EC-AAAC-4899-8E94-2D54EDE5F72E@eggert.org>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:02:43 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAK044SCF-L9Xmoc1vH=uQAe4k5XyYboamRcyTjSAaveu1uMGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e41fd105d68bbe9c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/rHzQPZDcprSNMzAr7O0KKE8xkzM>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:03:01 -0000

Hi Lars,

Thanks for updating the draft.
There seems to be lots of discussions and updates. So, if possible, I think
it would be great if there's highlights for the major updates.

Also, I am wondering if https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis/issues/135 has
been solved completely.
Have we decided to leave this part as it is? We don't need any texts here
or are there any future plans?

Thanks,
--
Yoshi


On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 2:50 AM Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> this -06 version rolls in all the changes requested during (and after)
> WGLC ended.
>
> I'll leave it up to the chairs to decide if another WGLC is warranted or
> the document can progress as-is.
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>
>
> > On 2022-1-26, at 11:12, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG
> of the IETF.
> >
> >        Title           : CUBIC for Fast and Long-Distance Networks
> >        Authors         : Lisong Xu
> >                          Sangtae Ha
> >                          Injong Rhee
> >                          Vidhi Goel
> >                          Lars Eggert
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06.txt
> >       Pages           : 35
> >       Date            : 2022-01-26
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   CUBIC is a standard TCP congestion control algorithm that uses a
> >   cubic function instead of a linear congestion window increase
> >   function to improve scalability and stability over fast and long-
> >   distance networks.  CUBIC has been adopted as the default TCP
> >   congestion control algorithm by the Linux, Windows, and Apple stacks.
> >
> >   This document updates the specification of CUBIC to include
> >   algorithmic improvements based on these implementations and recent
> >   academic work.  Based on the extensive deployment experience with
> >   CUBIC, it also moves the specification to the Standards Track,
> >   obsoleting RFC 8312.  This also requires updating RFC 5681, to allow
> >   for CUBIC's occasionally more aggressive sending behavior.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis/
> >
> > There is also an HTML version available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06.html
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-06
> >
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org:
> :internet-drafts
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tcpm mailing list
> > tcpm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>