Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04
mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Fri, 27 March 2020 13:31 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BC73A095C; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8bHitXFmaEN; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CAA93A0943; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr05.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.69]) by opfednr27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48pjS33cyvz4wVp; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:31:31 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1585315891; bh=mQIJ0MN5S9tUl8cSMKxVt38i2FovgFovKGVY245fNuI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=auex5PE4JzYf72zSdxbNJ2s4z10dgdXe1Mjq699Y/+J4L1hFOyAP4VJYAZgWxpJkE N4/OwlRuN43nXiRNIdvU1i0aKM2oeruqP22HG2LZFBU6AA1bupYcIJSCOth0z2VtWE 3aQFkscvLQ9l5iIuBRUb0r8PAAwjHG5fbgdRNV+s6l9dsB0eQmTDHBvJ/DxeUR23+A u9H8uxA+f98VuTzrGu3hddu/9QXRTthfkkeuxIUIQOdV/0qMc1FKaZY2B0wF+C1OEh GPfaHY2ocIKNxq/Uo3wDz8THAbm0zXb8ikORwZ5a+tHdIuIORepB3VfPvc8FYc2y7M b0DDzpsUl5NuA==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.73]) by opfednr05.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48pjS32hj0zyQ7; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:31:31 +0100 (CET)
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
CC: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, "draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp@ietf.org" <draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp@ietf.org>, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04
Thread-Index: AQHWBDhyjlsR8sb53kmN12TcRq3Zzqhca2TA
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:31:30 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031481D9D@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <ACE60B78-42E2-4932-86EA-14921A1D05D9@fh-muenster.de> <B574AAA7-6258-4B65-908B-89338C0B4E88@eggert.org> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031481D30@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <5D2DEEC6-3ECD-4134-8E85-13710ED965F5@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <5D2DEEC6-3ECD-4134-8E85-13710ED965F5@eggert.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/rL4P74Ux99kRaVdD5hwQtX_nk4s>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:31:35 -0000
Re-, I think that you missed the key point from my message: Grouping and reuse of modules. I'm not sure how this would apply for MIBs. Can you please tell me what is the equivalent of "uses"/"refine" statement with MIBs? Thank you. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Lars Eggert [mailto:lars@eggert.org] > Envoyé : vendredi 27 mars 2020 14:06 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN > Cc : Michael Tuexen; draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp@ietf.org; tcpm IETF > list > Objet : Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft- > scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04 > > On 2020-3-27, at 15:01, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote: > > > > Many YANG modules are already including TCP-specific components. > Some of these are already cited in the draft. These components are > defined outside tcpm, with little if not no review at all from tcpm. > Re-using some of the components defined in these documents may not be > straightforward. > > > > Defining here in tcpm the groupings that can be re-used by other > modules is more than appropriate. This is also to help developers of > other modules. > > If you replace "YANG module" with "SNMP MIB" in what you wrote, you > get exactly the argument that was made for why TSV should be doing > MIBs. > > Lars
- [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of dra… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… mohamed.boucadair
- [tcpm] FW: Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Scharf, Michael
- [tcpm] FW: Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Holland, Jake
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Holland, Jake
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… tom petch
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Joseph Touch
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Joseph Touch
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Joseph Touch
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… tom petch
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [tcpm] [Idr] Request for feedback on WG adopt… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of… ietfa