Re: [tcpm] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gomez-tcpm-ack-pull-00.txt]

Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Wed, 17 July 2019 11:06 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DBE1200B2 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 04:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RmWRwMJ5aJn9 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 04:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04124120048 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 04:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:7843:89ae:ec92:371] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:7843:89ae:ec92:371]) (Authenticated sender: lurchi) by drew.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A35DB72106C25; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 13:06:21 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <E60DF897-A846-4D32-852D-B9383AF38761@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 13:06:20 +0200
Cc: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>, jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5E0F8087-6B8A-4608-8C52-F4C5BA188B84@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <bc182c486692df3ecd3caf229703612f.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <CAAK044SrftVZEnj1FRQXmfA-XYS-nLshhM8-VgMOTig+E+AEyw@mail.gmail.com> <E60DF897-A846-4D32-852D-B9383AF38761@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/rjGty8IfRWUpS-BfDBgSM1VI4qY>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gomez-tcpm-ack-pull-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 11:06:29 -0000

> On 17. Jul 2019, at 09:56, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; wrote:
> 
> On Jul 17, 2019, at 08:58, Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
>> 
>> using a reserved flag is a bit expensive
> 
> The option could simply redefine existing PSH as having the AKP semantics.
> (And possibly all packets having what used to be the PSH semantics.)
Could you define what you mean by "what used to be the PSH semantics"?
> They are close enough anyway…
Hmm. My understanding of the OSH semantic is that it might trigger a local
behaviour on the receiver side: Deliver data to the application.
The AKP semantic is to trigger an behaviour on the network: send an ACK segment.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm