IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn-09

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 13 September 2018 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41050130F40; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=QSQEecKK; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=s+idFcOr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRyZQ7kb3Glt; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EFBF130F3F; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF675219E6; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 22:12:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Sep 2018 22:12:48 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=DfzN1YiiYuK+i3ZLoG5PqTOxGMDJF QCHEtX76nxx1Tk=; b=QSQEecKKprtP0DE5crHu2uHotCbRI32Ey2p3tmt6neWsD hhpQBX7UfhBvQV2QRM2n1mcgSdgI4p1tgsqTz6uSxCEa+0kycLyCptPFnsu9+uyJ oyuok2QYSqJi2DEdkPnZDz+DAtXVV/XzHx+e5Wb/9FAy8Y2sX+Ly7FDzYhA3SR69 OffxwkB7fOU1vbCyxy18SJpYYtM3PMkZFSriU7dCMsjCwrpGcveCQvtBdx703p0H 0g3EGQR7DAPc0PGHot6KJFmdBn+nBJSgK0h3Fqe6f1mYkrdsxbjQ9nFmURr6Kqcd 8ramEBBTNhb4g6PXjwlwsn0uuEs+VjpllaEvRJCYQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=DfzN1Y iiYuK+i3ZLoG5PqTOxGMDJFQCHEtX76nxx1Tk=; b=s+idFcOr7DhH1QLhNsfUHi c0KIgO68dwWMp/ypUcYk7pua1qpxjHojMQ/YykYMNkezm4DkfweVAU0nz/mEPnLa uSHzL7Bue+aN2hl6vV/tDQzrbZExxfH7LK2ju5tqnCb5z4vV3BXF+9fs9P9INqqy Dgu8HCztPCpqqYGDxKzJklByBwyNGqS/okWNtXaCeF0zh98yzI8/2Vc+Z6WoODtB Jbe7WmrQ/GkC25/gTnOIDNYtdvw0v3y64WZbankfKGttSwNcbImfZwQseVVbG2pv 5BGo8Ry7rpjUXHRyouFq6hiJDEtO7pYp1SpuHa0A+MdHiA8iGwwzUCsHXoEWerkg ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:n8eZWwl3SlDxKwb1zJJODC6OgFN4_XgBUgT4Ml-U9I2v0hjuNO2GqQ> <xmx:n8eZW8NE0-EgnEFiRPX4XLkloErDYQfHv1EPs3L-TNLOQ7_Pp8T34Q> <xmx:n8eZWzEKO7fsJD1fcNCn182yUh4GbTqZcsFhc_PncRCkwoXasB2RlQ> <xmx:n8eZW6txrHm_2eRy0mBNWsW2K1r8zQMosELjCle0IiU7AtY6q9b_RQ> <xmx:n8eZW7Sn9nzwD8o6ud140RSjgjELd-xmsK10UNhAV-gyaPjeTPkw4g> <xmx:oMeZW9fFgIh0aAfmiJpSAhj-ip8QemVmVTK6As8g88oY1yezYQWtFA>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:n8eZW8R_ux6atTknHN1-lObi94ruOlCqylpVXZdVtg74kgcXRM3_zg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (nccm-cmcs-client.cisco.com [173.38.117.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7A6A9102E2; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 22:12:47 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <153452985801.18009.2900521078281198682@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 22:12:45 -0400
Cc: gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>, tcpm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <454E8E3D-F192-44FF-8DE7-19D3A1446942@cooperw.in>
References: <153452985801.18009.2900521078281198682@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/rlbn2ijsPaxFV4St34u3qdCb7S4>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn-09
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 02:12:54 -0000

Russ, thanks for your review. Gorry, thanks for your response. I have entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Aug 17, 2018, at 2:17 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-alternativebackoff-ecn-09
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2018-08-17
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-08-28
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> 
> Major Concerns:
> 
> None
> 
> 
> Minor Concerns:
> 
> Section 2: Please update the first paragraph to reference RFC 8174
> in addition to RFC 2119, as follows: 
> 
>   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
>   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
>   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
>   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
>   capitals, as shown here.
> 
> Section 12.1: Please add a normative reference to RFC 7926.
> 
> 
> Nits:
> 
> Abstract: s/RFC3168/RFC 3168/
> 
> Section 1: s/RFC8087 [RFC8087]/[RFC8087]/
> 
> Section 1 says:
> 
>   However, currently used loss-based congestion control mechanisms
>   cannot always utilise a bottleneck link well where there are short
>   queues.
> 
> I stumbled on this sentence.  Maybe it would read better if you said
> that current mechanisms sometimes provides poor link utilization when
> queues are short.
> 
> Section 1: s/allow for short queues only/allow only for short queues/
> 
> Section 6: s/RFC3168 states/[RFC3168] states/ and
>           s/dropped packet [RFC3168]./dropped packet./
> 
> Section 6: s/the TCPM WG or IESG/the TCPM WG or the IESG/
> 
> Section 7" s/TCPM working group/TCPM Working Group/ or /TCPM WG/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email