IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Moving forward draft-touch-sne on independent stream?

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Mon, 29 November 2021 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57393A09EE; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:04:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oKciOL6UhOsw; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92f.google.com (mail-ua1-x92f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFE213A097E; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92f.google.com with SMTP id o1so36937798uap.4; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:04:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GDHxKajjz7qYozAEGun5IsCTft4fd39ey2KG/HI6TS8=; b=DGhWKN8HtxiFILzX/iXVK+s606Dk7fphd3sGx0iqZ4mLHRPawNNJioL5TW6TOumtb2 fg922Gvq0du2OyOTc/msAdYQe3xWzpARqfpvhhUBV/XguA5v0Ndh2cKsErZ2Duh4nWU5 0kncbeBWeMvawblw3WoVXmnCkz4Tg420CcUtAz3qGNxpqa7d8iJ29Itq9w5dVXN8xxFk JdwnU1I1SDfFO1gfDs9AnDum6/BdKFXKzmyfRkNA+7iGoL6uF/ss3WXI10npU1cZvOLv YSjrREVP5U4U0/ra1pVGexmn5exTThEhH8J4j8m06D+H9DzSguI3IH1W4XK7oWhyikJY 67Xg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GDHxKajjz7qYozAEGun5IsCTft4fd39ey2KG/HI6TS8=; b=RAumqoBamo6Hz8SSlVFVrK9qFaAZiS+Tv9iGqhyCGq4C2o8mgSLpTIWVwV91HsvJBB evVm7Jc/3aFdOU4s3x0b8JC1FqcVrXCNOWwEbPmqZ8vm+9f96yujuofvO8gn0Udi70N8 Dh1GWFkAt0et5kq3faA4jAXjkH51+GOlHkbgrsnu/zry0Ea766OZEU4TmtnjOumTZlE8 gkLbDJ8NQKgHTj75aEykkrSr25icZYxLTh84E8sqVrbq4zWlSrGreKnSCKn2b++EFv5I gpgMz7RE7dYedZb+pKrduqbyFQCwkurA17Fs2VWMp44jJYrP2xxiwxofMfzU6b5g1xj3 Lnpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MyueMSjB6L42ZKS1iNpO5yU3iAfUsj9gZodkfPg3zWRB3pG/B 7elwpC2lMuXbmF6j1XgpuOWaZnA9qorRRamWtkDdSjAM
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNzi+4tFg1ksvP5Xzlnzqx1IArEhjBtm9sVmyxukNun7J53KYk0zOdW5bt035lc6GYSFOjOe+dIdOQus64/w0=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f950:: with SMTP id u16mr36713399vsq.68.1638219854147; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:04:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8de93237209d4fc7ab062bbc24217999@hs-esslingen.de> <CAM4esxSKH_QTsVb5-nLOxVY3_f8-=wxhhutrkdWR2btH0njciA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAK044QNMxToQ_ZJVKhSbtje0SvpKJkvcyw9L8-_D1asJ1hPhQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAK044QNMxToQ_ZJVKhSbtje0SvpKJkvcyw9L8-_D1asJ1hPhQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:04:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM4esxSRxYftaag2vnyUuoohV+7PsO10LD0Xo7mFyzaETWZUDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "tcpm-chairs@ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007874bf05d1f3c815"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/rzbx2ZyOymVKx3PKBfwvdxiSFHA>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Moving forward draft-touch-sne on independent stream?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:04:25 -0000

SYN option space is not the subject of the draft.

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:29 PM Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> This is just my opinion as an individual contributor.
> I prefer to discuss this draft in the WG more rather than publishing it as
> an IS.
> I think SYN option space extension is an important feature for TCP's
> future, so I think it would be better to have a standardized solution for
> it.
> Also, I don't see strong benefits to publish it for now.
> --
> Yoshi
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:29 AM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The conflict review is now in my inbox, and we will discuss it on
>> December 2nd. If there are any concerns about this, please say so
>> immediately.
>>
>
>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 1:05 PM Scharf, Michael <
>> Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Joe has submitted draft-touch-sne to the ISE asking for publication of
>>> an RFC on the Independent Stream. (Background: An RFC on Independent Stream
>>> is not an IETF standard.)
>>>
>>> Publication on independent stream would be possible provided that the
>>> document does not conflict with TCPM or other IETF work. An obvious
>>> alternative would be homing the document in TCPM (or TSVWG) as an official
>>> WG item - but this is not what is currently proposed.
>>>
>>> A link to the document is:
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-touch-sne
>>>
>>> Note that the current header field "TCPM" would have to be replaced in
>>> the further publication process, as documents on the independent stream are
>>> not the outcome of an IETF WG.
>>>
>>> The TCPM chairs have reviewed draft-touch-sne. Our current understanding
>>> that there would be no harm caused by such an independent stream
>>> publication. As far as RFC 5925 is affected, we assume that an Errata would
>>> be possible and sufficient.
>>>
>>> Before we get back to the ISE regarding this document, we would like to
>>> cross-check whether our understanding is indeed the TCPM consensus:
>>>
>>> Are there any concerns inside the TCPM community regarding a publication
>>> of draft-touch-sne draft-touch-sne on independent stream? If so, please
>>> speak up!
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Michael
>>> on behalf of all chairs
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tcpm mailing list
>>> tcpm@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>>>
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email