Re: [tcpm] Beware the ordering of TCP options

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Tue, 28 October 2008 06:21 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C460A3A6BBA; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EA43A6BCD for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1wMamFXEWYIw for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netcore.fi (eunet-gw.ipv6.netcore.fi [IPv6:2001:670:86:3001::1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9FD3A6803 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netcore.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9S6L82t017274; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:21:08 +0200
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m9S6L7hj017271; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:21:08 +0200
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:21:07 +0200
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
In-Reply-To: <396556a20810271152h21cd0eb6s9fff99e629c0c17e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0810280820100.16490@netcore.fi>
References: <396556a20810271015s636f0585p41e413c4c37888e0@mail.gmail.com> <3C4D15BA-30EE-4CF6-85BE-B945BC995D14@nokia.com> <396556a20810271152h21cd0eb6s9fff99e629c0c17e@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94/8516/Tue Oct 28 00:33:09 2008 on otso.netcore.fi
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Beware the ordering of TCP options
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Adam Langley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> wrote:
>> Could you clarify if by "routers" you mean IP routers or cable/DSL modems?
>
> It's not clear. The only source of information that I have are the
> user bug reports listed above. Certainly some "consumer
> moderm"/NAT/wireless access point type of hardware broke. However,
> there were also a number of reports of Verizon DSL breaking with some
> diversity of consumer modems so it may be that something bigger broke
> there.

My guess would be a large percentage of routers (mainly in CPE market 
but maybe larger as well) which implement MSS inspection and clamping 
mechanisms.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm