IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-uto-02

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Fri, 22 September 2006 12:25 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQk5Y-0006Iz-Jf; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:25:04 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQk5X-0006Iu-Vu for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:25:03 -0400
Received: from smtp1.xmundo.net ([201.216.232.80]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQk5U-0003Wi-RO for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:25:03 -0400
Received: from venus.xmundo.net (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]) by smtp1.xmundo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1973CF0C51E; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:28:50 -0300 (ART)
Received: from fgont.gont.com.ar (171-180-231-201.fibertel.com.ar [201.231.180.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by venus.xmundo.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8MCOroL011647; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:24:55 -0300
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.0.20060922083417.066de878@gont.com.ar>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:35:46 -0300
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-uto-02
In-Reply-To: <451360BE.20608@isi.edu>
References: <BF9BD734.4234%gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <6.2.0.14.0.20051201035418.0323fc48@localhost> <4390569C.6050004@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <6.2.0.14.0.20051202201002.048b5de8@localhost> <20051208222808.GB22920@hut.isi.edu> <6.2.0.14.0.20051208164304.041ead70@localhost> <20051209182531.GC1177@hut.isi.edu> <439D7400.20902@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <20051212235603.GB1156@hut.isi.edu> <6.2.0.14.0.20051213012758.048ed298@localhost> <43A02978.4020809@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <45116707.9050301@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <7.0.1.0.0.20060920170030.05da7c80@gont.com.ar> <451360BE.20608@isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Cc: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>, tcpm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

At 01:04 22/09/2006, Joe Touch wrote:

>"An implementation that provides a system-wide toggle SHOULD assign the
>  default value to disable this feature"
>
>However, this still reads oddly; I'd prefer:
>
>"If an implementation provides a system-wide toggle to enable/disable
>UTO, that toggle SHOULD be initialized to disable UTO."

Okay, taken.

Thanks!

--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1






_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status