Re: [tcpm] tcp-auth-opt issue: reserved keyID value
Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Wed, 30 July 2008 23:20 UTC
Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C793A68A1; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96463A67E5 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2LOYj3zoRLNm for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230083A67AC for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.176.37] (c1-vpn7.isi.edu [128.9.176.37]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UNKmwW024807 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4890F72D.6050903@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:13 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
References: <4890F1FE.6060900@isi.edu> <396556a20807301613g11847764u29f672bb09338039@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <396556a20807301613g11847764u29f672bb09338039@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] tcp-auth-opt issue: reserved keyID value
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Adam Langley wrote: | On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote: |> Comments on additional pros and cons would be useful. Examples of how |> this might impact implementation efficiency would be particularly useful |> (esp. if not encumbered) | | I can only say that I found no problems handling a KeyID of 0. I'd be | interested to know what problems other suspect their might be with it. FWIW, this was not noted as a problem; the issue was that having a reserved value could make an implementation much more efficient. <individual hat on> I would like to hear some corroboration of this utility, preferably with a public demonstration of its value, since it otherwise adds an arbitrary rule to the mechanism. <individual hat off> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiQ9y0ACgkQE5f5cImnZruKXwCfYnsGH7v91PXiWi47eY/+OEKB mmYAoNlmlb7RQ8pxeiO1wYb9lUVAeshR =3KCX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tcpm mailing list tcpm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm