IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-01.txt

"Adam Langley" <agl@imperialviolet.org> Thu, 17 July 2008 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CE53A6812; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992333A68BD for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2XKgTAUdYGCm for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EED3A6812 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so1637437yxg.49 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=vPn80AMMUrO7rX75qXJuoSv2cTPLzue4NdFjB1dPFAU=; b=c1EcUPFx2t7k5Ys1QZ/wxx/ngeHySXQkjPsBAFIO4SS0pEIWGkC5y4i9zrjr2YBUh7 6Dip7Md3XpcbLy56qQeA/AKx6Dg9ZxSITbkMb7UHbz28Q8/k/KZqeWdblQZZhsEQrQz2 gJbzhL9WAEMSk+KNdq/nba0pZfXGBmKyz7sPQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=NehGth6jBonphmRC9pz8B5Mxxlg8BmmsQQs+dGP8m2wlC3AhFsB26+DHaVds8Ly5Me wod1AtTtqQZT0x/gwmSjszOIJKrdHaYlUArqjKKs/sKhQYLrX5V2HZCSqkk21nsskkk1 99djFYoEby2ca3m9CqpB90svp4UqOJ2EKU6JQ=
Received: by 10.141.133.14 with SMTP id k14mr797481rvn.127.1216255270936; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.186.3 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <396556a20807161741p20cb4902l50f14856b8332716@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:41:10 -0700
From: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: Stefanos Harhalakis <v13@v13.gr>
In-Reply-To: <200807170325.59866.v13@v13.gr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080714234502.AC4793A69F4@core3.amsl.com> <396556a20807161609x455948f8qa40414799b64de72@mail.gmail.com> <487E809C.7090608@isi.edu> <200807170325.59866.v13@v13.gr>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8de55c9fd8379c33
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-01.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Stefanos Harhalakis <v13@v13.gr> wrote:
> Apart from that, I believe that you (we) should fill a bug report.

Well, since I was the last person to rewrite the options code in
Linux(*), you might as well tell me here :)

I'm not sure exactly what the issue is here. There isn't excessive
padding: 99.9% of packets have only a timestamp option and thus have
the minimal amount of padding. The advantage of writing/reading
aligned data outweighs better compaction in SYN frames since there's
(currently) no options that we excluded because of the padding.

(*) it should be in .27, maybe .28

AGL

-- 
Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email