[tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-03

"Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> Mon, 08 March 2010 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AD63A6BAC for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:49:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.528
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W3U7KwuH8U4Q for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:49:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7585F3A6BC0 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:49:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.103]) by ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FDEA8812 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:49:34 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ndjshub04.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub04-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.34]) by ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o28JnYUg001816 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:49:34 -0600
Received: from NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.166]) by ndjshub04.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.163]) with mapi; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:49:33 -0600
From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:49:32 -0600
Thread-Topic: poll for adoption of draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-03
Thread-Index: Acq++HkxzqlYiFb8RpWTnjXxmEEnYQ==
Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47DF997795@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2010-03-08_10:2010-02-06, 2010-03-08, 2010-03-08 signatures=0
Subject: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-03
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:49:35 -0000

Hello, Fernando has made an update to his draft on the
generation of TCP timestamps, and asked us to poll the
TCPM WG to have this particular document adopted as a
WG draft for BCP.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-03

This was briefly discussed at IETF 73 in Minneapolis,
and the decision was delayed until more people had read
it.

Please respond if you either:

(1) Support making this document a WG document with the
    target for BCP.

(2) Oppose making this document a WG document.

Of course, other comments are also welcome :).

It's relatively short, so if people could respond in the
next 2 weeks, this would allow us to determine consensus
during the week of the IETF meeting.


--
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems