To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] Re: draft-ietf-tcpm-ecnsyn-03.txt backwards
 compatibility 
In-Reply-To: <200801041813.m04IDQCG008957@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> 
Organization: International Computer Science Institute (ICSI)
Song-of-the-Day: And We Danced
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:28:58 -0500
Message-Id: <20080104182858.1D38B329395@lawyers.icir.org>
Cc: Aleksandar Kuzmanovic <akuzma@northwestern.edu>,
 "K. K. Ramakrishnan" <kkrama@research.att.com>,
 Amit Mondal <a-mondal@northwestern.edu>, tcpm@ietf.org
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0810612598=="
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

--===============0810612598==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_bOundary";
 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=_bOundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline


> The draft talks of itself as "a modification to RFC 3168". Will ECN+
> be marked as "UPDATES RFC3168" in the RFC index?
> 
> At least that will help ensure anyone who implements based on the
> RFC index will not have a choice between RFC3168 and ECN+

Without having considered this for more than a few seconds, I think it
is reasonable to think this will be labeled as an 'update' to RFC3168.
If someone thinks that would be somehow bogus, please speak up.

allman




--=_bOundary
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFHfnrpWyrrWs4yIs4RAgzZAKCLUfYOj7wzSahXXnuLXxnTQ00m3QCgiafw
dvJaVMUILU8+Kb9TSUOuwcY=
=UZmt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=_bOundary--



--===============0810612598==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

--===============0810612598==--