Re: [tcpm] TCP zero window timeout?

Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU> Wed, 30 August 2006 16:24 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GISry-00034z-2G; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:24:50 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GISrx-00034t-0p for tcpm@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:24:49 -0400
Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GISrv-000546-Kp for tcpm@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:24:49 -0400
Received: from hut.isi.edu (hut.isi.edu [128.9.168.160]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7UGNkig002857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from faber@localhost) by hut.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k7UGNkqM018538; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:23:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from faber)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:23:46 -0700
From: Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU>
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP zero window timeout?
Message-ID: <20060830162345.GL15769@hut.isi.edu>
References: <20060829165756.GB89836@hut.isi.edu> <20060829181314.50826.qmail@web31715.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060830152210.GI15769@hut.isi.edu> <44F5BA87.4050602@isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <44F5BA87.4050602@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-url: http://www.isi.edu/~faber
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: faber@hut.isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336
Cc: "Mahdavi, Jamshid" <jamshid.mahdavi@bluecoat.com>, tcpm@ietf.org, "Anantha Ramaiah \(ananth\)" <ananth@cisco.com>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1141642015=="
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:19:19AM -0700, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
> 
> Ted Faber wrote:
> ...
> > I don't understand why you're against doing this in the app, but I don't
> > think I understand your whole problem either.  I suggest writing a draft
> > and giving us the full picture.
> 
> I'd rather see succinct answers to the alternatives suggested here that
> motivate a TCP-level solution first.


There are six people exchanging mail about a problem and a solution that
don't seem well defined to me.  IMHO agreeing on what we're talking
about will simplify that discussion.
> 
> IDs can easily themselves be a DOS attack on IETF resources.

Or a necessary step forward.

-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm