[tcpm] Loose ends tied up in draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-19 (AccECN)

Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Mon, 11 July 2022 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C172CC14CF1E for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CrvCxCeGLK7E for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu (mail-ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu [185.185.85.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9141DC14CF12 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=eDn5V1GrppuOZnCBSmbvJjDE/mIwVCMlRcTkWgt08bU=; b=ECIgJxxM5y/FAzHpiS1gG+Ym7r jUm6a2xrausbcY2V7bBcCJYd57m7xhGpnh0PIRNP37NwlAT4cz5jemBs6BzaBmPzi35x7uRHVCqXq OFYFhVS6iCUtbswRAZkmx9dskuaCcdSQWs4jkNSVvHXqPdpH7VpUdATgTPnm42pmzS2ba7QaeQewe HSuzdnCYnnW0z+XyrNOJwJoRHUALxRXhyjTTgbSjVUuIGL+ZPKNOgGFGK3c5RliJA28aZHIgVzE/6 XTOs46qeo8AsB4/PN/3vPPyWEJsmE6SyqGFe2ABh5c2p+Wr7Dl9gjvnFikr8DeNdSzYfFk58qs4dX JFGJAOcQ==;
Received: from 67.153.238.178.in-addr.arpa ([178.238.153.67]:43532 helo=[192.168.1.4]) by ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1oAv34-00085G-Aw; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:10:09 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------asbHvqGeTzSzwb0pr0JYcHyN"
Message-ID: <f335c126-f4ef-bb4b-aff5-695ce2d649df@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:10:06 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
References: <165755043725.5209.16524611109303378389@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
In-Reply-To: <165755043725.5209.16524611109303378389@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/wUXFwwvbCTotCMbx1-BXVqb08zo>
Subject: [tcpm] Loose ends tied up in draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-19 (AccECN)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:10:14 -0000

@Yoshi, this completes all the changes I believe have been requested or 
are needed.

@tcpm, Summary of changes (see diff linked below for full details)


      ==Normative Changes==


3.3.3. 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-19#section-3.3.3> 
Requirements for TCP ACK Filtering

  * RFC3449 already says ACK filtering nodes have to ensure they don't
    interfere with the correction operation of ECN feedback.
      o Altho' RFC3449 references RFC3168, given AccECN updates RFC3168,
        the requirement can beassumed to apply to both RFC3168 and
        AccECN f/.
      o So no need to update RFC3449 and altered text accordingly.
  * Also stated worst-case wrap.
  * All as discussed in the thread "RFC3449 and AccECN
    <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/hD9W-STuLv3Km04x0Cy1obgjApA/>"


      ==Normative/ Technical Changes==

3.2.3. 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-19#section-3.2.3> 
The AccECN Option

  * If partial implementation, recommended at least implementing sending
    of AccECN Option, even if not the receive logic (switched round from
    previous version).
  * All as discussed in the thread "Partial implementation of AccECN
    Option logic
    <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/0uJumvVAu4i88fmbT7wKlrpP5B0/>"
    and as proposed at the IETF-113 tcpm meeting


      ==Editorial==

Altered order of "3.2.2.3. 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-19#section-3.2.2.3> 
Testing for Mangling of the IP/ECN Field" to better reflect the order 
the implementation uses (suggested by Ilpo).



Bob



On 11/07/2022 15:40, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : More Accurate ECN Feedback in TCP
>          Authors         : Bob Briscoe
>                            Mirja Kühlewind
>                            Richard Scheffenegger
>    Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-19.txt
>    Pages           : 61
>    Date            : 2022-07-11
>
> Abstract:
>     Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) is a mechanism where network
>     nodes can mark IP packets instead of dropping them to indicate
>     incipient congestion to the end-points.  Receivers with an ECN-
>     capable transport protocol feed back this information to the sender.
>     ECN was originally specified for TCP in such a way that only one
>     feedback signal can be transmitted per Round-Trip Time (RTT).  Recent
>     new TCP mechanisms like Congestion Exposure (ConEx), Data Center TCP
>     (DCTCP) or Low Latency Low Loss Scalable Throughput (L4S) need more
>     accurate ECN feedback information whenever more than one marking is
>     received in one RTT.  This document updates the original ECN
>     specification to specify a scheme to provide more than one feedback
>     signal per RTT in the TCP header.  Given TCP header space is scarce,
>     it allocates a reserved header bit previously assigned to the ECN-
>     Nonce.  It also overloads the two existing ECN flags in the TCP
>     header.  The resulting extra space is exploited to feed back the IP-
>     ECN field received during the 3-way handshake as well.  Supplementary
>     feedback information can optionally be provided in a new TCP option,
>     which is never used on the TCP SYN.  The document also specifies the
>     treatment of this updated TCP wire protocol by middleboxes.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-19.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-19
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoehttp://bobbriscoe.net/