Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Sat, 03 April 2010 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FA03A684B for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KLy3u5hIMwRK for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.xmundo.net (smtp1.xmundo.net [201.216.232.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD3C3A67FC for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from venus.xmundo.net (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]) by smtp1.xmundo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91E36B6675; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 20:27:40 -0300 (ART)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (129-130-17-190.fibertel.com.ar [190.17.130.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by venus.xmundo.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o33NRVpL008049; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 20:27:32 -0300
Message-ID: <4BB7CEE3.6020706@gont.com.ar>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:27:31 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
References: <EC7B72027914A242B991C029F5F213CF3EBF3BAB5B@exchsvr01.ocarina.local> <20100401195320.65DE6C97755@lawyers.icir.org> <k2w1e41a3231004011340l7ff33c9fg16e92ccbec32ba01@mail.gmail.com> <4BB7820E.1010203@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4BB7820E.1010203@isi.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]); Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:27:39 -0300 (ART)
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, Murali Bashyam <MBashyam@ocarinanetworks.com>, mallman@icir.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 23:27:41 -0000

Joe Touch wrote:

> I don't think so either. RFC 793 specifies an API (including ABORT), but
> not how it is instantiated.
> 
> It looks like this is already possible, though:
> 
> Linux has abort via: CLOSE after SO_LINGER(l_onoff=nonzero, l_linger=0)

I agree with Joe here.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1