[tcpm] intended status of UTO

Although UTO has finished last-call and been submitted
for publication, Magnus has noted that there seemed to
be a question during last call about its intended status
that wasn't conclusively resolved.

Our ADs would like to make sure that there isn't going
to be a problem with publishing this as proposed standard,
and need the WG's feedback in order to advance the document.

By my homework, the charter item for UTO was written for
a proposed standard.  When I checked the archives, it
looked like Pasi was the only WGLC commenter that argued
for experimental, and on the other hand, Joe, Mark,
Caitlin, and Toby all seemed to support it as proposed
standard.  Versions 04 through 09 of the draft include
"Intended status: Standards Track".

However, in the IETF 68 minutes, I found this:
  * Lars and chairs did not remember if this is going for experimental
or
    proposed. Tim Shepard has preference for experimental.
    - Tim Shepherd: in San Diego asked this explicitly from chairs
during
      agenda bashing, they said the plan is for Experimental.
    - Lars: ok
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm