[tcpm] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 16 December 2021 18:32 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711273A0CA3; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 10:32:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis@ietf.org, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org, tcpm@ietf.org, Michael Scharf <michael.scharf@hs-esslingen.de>, michael.scharf@hs-esslingen.de
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.41.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <163967955473.4578.10718776217222320323@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 10:32:35 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/y9Lt7XHDZloVNwIzXRVed2YNqxE>
Subject: [tcpm] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:32:37 -0000
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- EDIT --- I originally balloted DISCUSS, ending with "As noted in https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/, a DISCUSS ballot is a request to have a discussion; I really think that the document would be improved with a change here, but can be convinced otherwise." - I see that there was a discussion on the list. I still think that it would be useful to have some additional text so that users don't cut themselves on sharp edges, but this is just my opinion, and so I'm clearing the DISCUSS. Thanks all for the DISCUSSion. ---- Thank you very much to the authors and WG for writing this -- it's an important piece of work, and seems like it was probably also a large amount of work. Thanks! Also, thanks to Sarah Banks for the OpsDir review - it was helpful. Oh, and thanks to Erik, whose text I stole :-)
- [tcpm] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf… Warren Kumari via Datatracker