IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Proceeding CUBIC draft

Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 19 April 2022 08:27 UTC

Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADE73A0654; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 01:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tSeP2daA6zsH; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 01:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa1-x2f.google.com (mail-oa1-x2f.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFD243A005F; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 01:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa1-x2f.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-e2afb80550so16727982fac.1; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 01:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Z6xcCcvG283hZ6ko7pql3VepbREbDCHghkHMnLUedtA=; b=KGA2e/plmDl5ZU17kHqkAPZPKbfDNz9BSiF7ZedOsI/FbNykz3jX5SoXWWsMKKz2TP ncCOY+WzPf29zUWL48TCAOy9+G4dE5s5/V4+191pn7Lp1l9qJcbnDxKYjJ/B6yq23tZ5 DN8HOWYfjHaIVHS2oSpTbRVHaZuoxy8Q4nmOyHXKugcPzLBq+wFV+fJ620O3LVHpnEA0 IlfO/Sc035Hp9Q7yiSmfDoqWdlysHzXzPAq8SLvQaS3AQPe62PVWSpHcexf+eU8Wo63q myrL9BcRtOh2z5MX9b8xm6ooBv2yUTR5u4R30kmNRo9c7TKvwY6o7YfQX0IVAFCFXwsd bGDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Z6xcCcvG283hZ6ko7pql3VepbREbDCHghkHMnLUedtA=; b=uL1OTFR4Qlni0auUIaSeKvHEnZQqxaFwpCCGWOUnMuFBi6mWoYmIBZR4ldmKDDImYD /wbwJkXXkimmSrTqpiwhNSCQeTMRw+sOCSfTTe/VZSw0+TDEhnlD8BMh1ExuRpLKnC7+ fGisyyDDNdjurIQ/2SavuyzeUa8m89tvRidGIeyTjTVZPG0YBC3qycC24xUDUFGFVL+8 LyIBgfTyMzYSdTMud3SuXUOz4UzVzX6dwGN00X8zt/xHrMNx4WjM1zrwjpVzuXZcjGdB koZD3QCjKU5BtBDCp3QvcfVw4r4rSD6btaOJbChnyq7Rrh9tuuZ5iJzbB5CyVZ8zdHqi 8DgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gf0vZj7hkMxv8OIL6FApy+uHxbLlGKUFymXqlVRFjwEQGbQRi DZ9k/Pwf7drRmFJz9LOSxLFdxQOZkbxxAUeU2xQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJze5Gr1HLVcVfQdrhTTSLgcvIgMCU78yD2eDVKrquvP+jQD6klUE0WFKvqT9ng6T20RK7A5CNZrShzVR2izLGs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:5708:b0:db:2ef8:f220 with SMTP id k8-20020a056870570800b000db2ef8f220mr7933306oap.198.1650356873028; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 01:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAK044R12B3f+=2mR1ZK15Zkno5n0YvsjGy64LBiBgBN+9n71A@mail.gmail.com> <CAK6E8=fZs--fR+5Rie1NgtrA4cviatVW=Aw+qkeuqstk9DB0Hw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK6E8=fZs--fR+5Rie1NgtrA4cviatVW=Aw+qkeuqstk9DB0Hw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 01:27:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAK044S3RnvbTzOSHR+B26XCFEiT=YbiNGqQUH4zV4T8c9ZfgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002b675d05dcfda7dd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/yU0d-CZOF8bE1aqkx0cUp4h5JAQ>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Proceeding CUBIC draft
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:27:58 -0000

Hi Yuchung,

Yes, that will be very helpful. I'd really appreciate If folks who want to
add something could provide some proposed texts.

Thanks,
--
Yoshi

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 3:35 PM Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 10:04 PM Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> > I think we've seen a solid consensus to publish the CUBIC draft as a PS
> doc during the last WG meeting. So, the chairs are thinking about
> proceeding in this direction.
> >
> > It seems to me that the remaining point of the draft is whether we add
> some texts to the doc or publish it as it is. In my impression, it seems
> that more people prefer to add some texts.
> >
> > In case of adding some texts, we would like to understand what they will
> be.
> > Do we add the discussion points that Markku and Bob raised or we would
> like to mention that CUBIC has been deployed without IETF process, or
> something else?
> is there a proposed text diff so we can make more educated judgement?
>
> >
> > We appreciate your feedback on this point or anything related to the doc
> and the process.
> > --
> > Yoshi
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tcpm mailing list
> > tcpm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email