Re: [tcpm] Milestones changed for tcpm WG

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 03 May 2021 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D9E3A1EB5; Mon, 3 May 2021 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.386
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.386 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HAS_X_OUTGOING_SPAM_STAT=2.484, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Ni3lhq7SchW; Mon, 3 May 2021 11:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-5.web-hosting.com (server217-5.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A96C13A1EA8; Mon, 3 May 2021 11:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gYf5QVOWMZls8/o39g8MBPl20uc7j5tGXBqlEhDY7qA=; b=qFhbg5PTpwretbqTn3khJeagD RalKwt0WD2kauUxbCoD/Dyx+1rUjPp/K1xNI1dF9FUfE5QcgxHj+oEjclXV8RsUrdJlT0lF65WMR2 NjtEudfsbi0ry7eGJzqOtbxdRosoTO5MkkLNQjxPCLMeA5K4/4Z3aK8NDT/sx2PODz734klBdgAE0 LeWZIg7QvUgdfmebAmTfPFJiqhVOIElvy6qLUcBZSrE1NJr9EoI1AqahqIQv8HbpNG+fLII9l6+CH 3RDNIVliw/0djpLrrifZs9L2D6SUr0ctWxjASpFWfhVUd0SsD+M+Nw5Sk89n0l3jicivoSO+kkek2 4IE0meGSA==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:58839 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1ldcxX-001knH-6b; Mon, 03 May 2021 14:06:23 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7B6E3156-C9D7-486A-BCB3-54057191618C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAK044Sc=pG9u55sJ+ywhTGUTyLR76hP+8VPa=KNSO=CNAM5JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 11:06:18 -0700
Cc: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <FA9A9813-2FD6-41AB-A0CE-585F383BE043@strayalpha.com>
References: <161296020545.28489.5614088363628035666@ietfa.amsl.com> <043F495B-53A1-491A-906B-DAF6F5369F9E@strayalpha.com> <CAAK044Sc=pG9u55sJ+ywhTGUTyLR76hP+8VPa=KNSO=CNAM5JQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/zJ1ZcO5_EcFwe4_HEjfB3UWctgI>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Milestones changed for tcpm WG
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 18:06:29 -0000

Hi, Yoshi,

> On May 2, 2021, at 11:31 PM, Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Joe,
> 
> Thanks for bringing this up again. 
> In my understanding, there was no clear consensus on the interactions with TSO yet. Or, have we settled?

I don’t understand what “consensus” would mean.

TSO isn’t a standard; it’s an implementation, i.e., which ought to follow the TCP standards.

Nothing we’re doing deviates from how standards-compliant implementations handle options. However, if an implementation incorrectly ignores unknown options, then it would could be problematic for this approach, as well as others.

> I thought you'll update the draft for this. 

I’m not sure what to say about this issue - do you want me to point out the issue with TSO sometimes causing problems because it’s out of spec?

If so, I can do that.

Joe

> 
> Thanks, 
> --
> Yoshi
> 
> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 9:30 AM Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com <mailto:touch@strayalpha.com>> wrote:
> Hi, all,
> 
> I believe there are no known pending issues with this draft; it might be ready for WGLC.
> 
> If so, though, there is a question about the corresponding SYN extension option. I would like to submit that as a WG experimental doc at the same time, or, if not, to submit it as an individual experimental doc. Either way, the docs should be linked in the publication process so they can cite each other (even informationally) by RFC number rather than draft name.
> 
> Can you let me know how best to proceed?
> 
> Thank you,
> Joe
> 
> > On Feb 10, 2021, at 4:30 AM, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org <mailto:ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>> wrote:
> > 
> > Changed milestone "Submit document on a TCP Extended Data Offset Option to
> > the IESG as a Proposed Standard RFC", added draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo to
> > milestone.
> > 
> > URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tcpm/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tcpm/about/>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > tcpm mailing list
> > tcpm@ietf.org <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm