Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-10.txt

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Tue, 03 July 2018 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CF4130E8F for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 05:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMsk9fub1H4w for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 05:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7E13130E84 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 05:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id f18-v6so1301358qtp.10 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 05:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=IvxYvTgv2ISKtL78g4yGZXEYKmQhhGvWYr3uJxyAs2Q=; b=HTccu3IH8/OCdhtkYhiNMhqmu2s9Lrs7nrkeaFLqpEA4ssezq/8xXogs/HKZzPXL4N vLMJr6nkWPm+YJRC8npExgg7B+0sW4vhYsICrkRgxzYC8bjnwdg2Vra5EXZNS81oOFqt ZrpOVMGpuEZ3ROnY3iAaPVFoR0RMmHMfk4ha2wbWMQVbXNZWA+fcs5G0nqNbUpR7A5Vo LkDxh+JPzNF4EIo9f/Q9i965t2nL9vVp87uNnvJSPLqYFAGUV53uEp9FCAVpkcR6G9SP o8hh5YiHI5t6W2OPmu5pCy5t9vKhdK0HM+C+EnyWUg5vOO7G8RQkmy0QCLfT4jnE78Oe QPWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=IvxYvTgv2ISKtL78g4yGZXEYKmQhhGvWYr3uJxyAs2Q=; b=Qjr0qp20zWG9MSVI/Yul+jmbsLPTfYGC8Ijwwp/rjfSd/BLUDoqtzEYjXI3PhQZU6k DG+ddkSKMKX7Ob1LxbKqw5fxB1f8DFHheWfT9/qB24kZHlcsJYHT1fwKRHUQOTEzNwyo I6rh4d6pd8zfKdqxJWCKODtGzPrUJr2wKbyqTzsizgBVoiZRDS5MoJRUWSTvT8aNiYV7 fg0iDxhuS2h+s+WxLrle4JZqmh659Q2zQJP+Q7/fYLMmrnli3W5iyjsRKZan1iyPSQQw Y0DVTHBMr1Jdy9q4zVaxTxr+RioCAr2GpUji7MtPTfMDMOwECE3UvqFmWl6bChq1sOId DsiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2weS3Nndl7pNhkG3VjCdRrkyvysBMhXdQ92X1fJFDTd5mCmADW iLKUq9b5reeAZS0xnHfKS/WRsZkKY0k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpe8rE9j2r/6u5V+FUOcyNuTmblv3rB/jSoDrQym1aS6kGAyQJOO7uvrVs8/FeomRpGzV9fQ7Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:90e1:: with SMTP id p88-v6mr25993406qvp.145.1530620628927; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 05:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.105] (rrcs-69-135-1-122.central.biz.rr.com. [69.135.1.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 18-v6sm667896qtw.43.2018.07.03.05.23.48 for <tcpm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Jul 2018 05:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: tcpm@ietf.org
References: <153050488054.27349.1876886521545326995@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <6fc34b38-0dd5-7f84-1394-c5131eeb14bc@mti-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 08:23:46 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <153050488054.27349.1876886521545326995@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/zjiJFO5OZZHLuSSjs2q7Bzib7lc>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-10.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 12:23:53 -0000

This is a small update that mainly attempts to address:

- comments from Yuchung and Gorry about attempts in the previous 
revisions to replace obsoleted TOS with DiffServ

- comments from Joe on security considerations

Comments, critiques, and corrections are welcome!



On 7/2/2018 12:14 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : Transmission Control Protocol Specification
>          Author          : Wesley M. Eddy
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-10.txt
> 	Pages           : 102
> 	Date            : 2018-07-01
>
> Abstract:
>     This document specifies the Internet's Transmission Control Protocol
>     (TCP).  TCP is an important transport layer protocol in the Internet
>     stack, and has continuously evolved over decades of use and growth of
>     the Internet.  Over this time, a number of changes have been made to
>     TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been
>     documented in a piecemeal fashion.  This document collects and brings
>     those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793.
>     This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as 879, 2873, 6093, 6429,
>     6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793.  It updates RFC 1122,
>     and should be considered as a replacement for the portions of that
>     document dealing with TCP requirements.  It updates RFC 5961 due to a
>     small clarification in reset handling while in the SYN-RECEIVED
>     state.
>
>     RFC EDITOR NOTE: If approved for publication as an RFC, this should
>     be marked additionally as "STD: 7" and replace RFC 793 in that role.
>
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-10
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-10
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-10
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm