Re: [tcpm] tcpsecure: how strong to recommend?

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Fri, 28 September 2007 17:02 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbJEx-0003UW-2b; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:02:59 -0400
Received: from tcpm by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IbJEw-0003UR-QK for tcpm-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:02:58 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbJEw-0003UJ-Fh for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:02:58 -0400
Received: from pork.icsi.berkeley.edu ([192.150.186.19]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbJEw-0005d2-4d for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:02:58 -0400
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-69-222-35-58.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [69.222.35.58]) by pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l8SH2upG025132; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:02:57 -0700
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (adsl-69-222-35-58.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [69.222.35.58]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43933FFE4C7; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:02:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480052A9E95; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:01:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Mitesh Dalal (mdalal)" <mdalal@cisco.com>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] tcpsecure: how strong to recommend?
In-Reply-To: <13D1EAB852BE194C94773A947138483D041D8B78@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR)
Song-of-the-Day: Car Phone
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:01:42 -0400
Message-Id: <20070928170142.480052A9E95@lawyers.icir.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0768906488=="
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

[catching up]

> A point to note is that we neither obsolete nor update rfc793, so if we

I think this is wrong.  I think this document clearly updates 793.  It
says to do something differently from what 793 says and so I don't see
how you can say it does not somehow update that document.

allman



_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm