Return-Path: X-Original-To: tcpprague@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tcpprague@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7DB1200F7; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:16:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BxAwR2nAtkHa; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.dnsblock1.com (server.dnsblock1.com [85.13.236.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FDFD120045; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:16:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Pe7e6asRk8/Ptaiu49J0959BVgTBuDsyHBQQ7X2UR5c=; b=eHAUBiMTogV30j5SCvXnZM5me 97STp9H/PuAOegSHkER8YnXcNMarpGqD8ZIEPs5zUR7mIeDhHHKq9XDwqyT/Q/uE7QdMT2UNuFnZ/ TC/mQpZRv9dZ7yDBnXcJKppBGp3ZrR+o6n78TS8w89ZnK59gOIu9oIkSxGG4ZI2Jd2DCSJQBWijcL twGcSwIr2KUoSqjRtZk67+7FRpaWrxIU7ki0NKqYgMLLVHVesJ+CyQVXDGKxI6SdWB6Vb2ywF6eqx pP9u+yj2AVqKqRkMEpD9rnKk8zlC/1CkvaL24srUx83gdoWQpz5Qg6QkGioT54ciSKOTAjPvmQuOk T6YFYRhHg==; Received: from [31.185.128.123] (port=54770 helo=[192.168.0.6]) by server.dnsblock1.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hnVk7-0000Tk-5X; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 23:16:15 +0100 References: To: TCP Prague List , tsvwg IETF list From: Bob Briscoe X-Forwarded-Message-Id: Message-ID: <7c0efa88-362e-9213-45d5-5d2864bd4cf1@bobbriscoe.net> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 23:16:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------964BABF24D715F65860E42F3" Content-Language: en-GB X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.dnsblock1.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.dnsblock1.com: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net X-Authenticated-Sender: server.dnsblock1.com: in@bobbriscoe.net Archived-At: Subject: [tcpPrague] Fwd: L4S - Low Latency Low Loss Scalable throughput at IETF-105 Montreal hackathon X-BeenThere: tcpprague@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "To coordinate implementation and standardisation of TCP Prague across platforms. TCP Prague will be an evolution of DCTCP designed to live alongside other TCP variants and derivatives." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:16:20 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------964BABF24D715F65860E42F3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FYI, -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: L4S - Low Latency Low Loss Scalable throughput at IETF-105 Montreal hackathon Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:07:53 +0000 From: De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) To: hackathon@ietf.org CC: Bob Briscoe , Tilmans, Olivier (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) Hi all, We'll be working again on L4S topics during the IETF-105 hackaton. This time we also target interop testing and application testing: If you have a client and server application that you want to improve/test when using L4S, you can try it out on our testbed. If you have an implementation of a DualQ, or Prague compliant congestion control, we can test different interop scenarios. Details and links to resources/supporting drafts are available at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietf/meeting/wiki/105hackathon#L4S and copied below. See you in Montreal. Koen. L4S - Low Latency Low Loss Scalable throughput * Champion(s)   * Bob Briscoe (Independent) ietf at bobbriscoe dot net   * Koen De Schepper (Nokia Bell Labs) koen.de_schepper at nokia-bell-labs dot com * Project(s)   * DualQ Coupled AQM: Compare, contrast & walk through implementations   * TCP Prague: Fall-back to TCP-Friendly on detection of classic ECN bottleneck   * L4S interop testing: How does your DualQ or Prague TCP/QUIC/... implementation work compared to others?   * L4S Application testing: How is your application performing when using L4S/Prague? Does it benefit from lower queuing delay? How noticeable is the difference? Is it L4S ready, how to improve? * Resources: L4S Landing page with links to repos, documentation, etc: ​https://riteproject.eu/dctth/#code --------------964BABF24D715F65860E42F3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FYI,



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: L4S - Low Latency Low Loss Scalable throughput at IETF-105 Montreal hackathon
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:07:53 +0000
From: De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>
To: hackathon@ietf.org <hackathon@ietf.org>
CC: Bob Briscoe <research@bobbriscoe.net>, Tilmans, Olivier (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <olivier.tilmans@nokia-bell-labs.com> 


Hi all,
 
We'll be working again on L4S topics during the IETF-105 hackaton.
This time we also target interop testing and application testing:
If you have a client and server application that you want to improve/test when using L4S, you can try it out on our testbed.
If you have an implementation of a DualQ, or Prague compliant congestion control, we can test different interop scenarios.
 
Details and links to resources/supporting drafts are available at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietf/meeting/wiki/105hackathon#L4S and copied below.
 
See you in Montreal.
 
Koen.
 
 
L4S - Low Latency Low Loss Scalable throughput
 
* Champion(s)
  * Bob Briscoe (Independent) ietf at bobbriscoe dot net
  * Koen De Schepper (Nokia Bell Labs) koen.de_schepper at nokia-bell-labs dot com
* Project(s)
  * DualQ Coupled AQM: Compare, contrast & walk through implementations
  * TCP Prague: Fall-back to TCP-Friendly on detection of classic ECN bottleneck
  * L4S interop testing: How does your DualQ or Prague TCP/QUIC/... implementation work compared to others?
   * L4S Application testing: How is your application performing when using L4S/Prague? Does it benefit from lower queuing delay? How noticeable is the difference? Is it L4S ready, how to improve?
* Resources: L4S Landing page with links to repos, documentation, etc: ​https://riteproject.eu/dctth/#code
 
--------------964BABF24D715F65860E42F3--