[tcpPrague] One additional edit for draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-01.txt

David,


On 25/10/16 21:56, Black, David wrote:
> This version picks up all the review comments, with the exception of Bob Briscoe's -
> Bob sent me a very extensive review privately that merits spending another version
> of the draft on - watch for a -02 version of this draft soon.
In addition to my prior offlist review comments, here's one more I 
noticed, while checking the -01:

2. Scope

CURRENT:
    ECT Differences:  Use ECT(1) to request ECN congestion marking
       behavior in the network that differs from ECT(0), e.g., as
       proposed in [I-D.briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id].  This is at variance
       with RFC 3168's requirement that ECT(0)-marked traffic and ECT(1)-
       marked traffic not receive different treatment in the network.
PROPOSED:
    ECT Differences:  Use ECT(1) to request more frequent ECN congestion 
marking
       behavior in the network counterbalanced by a reduced response to 
each mark
       at the sender, both of which differ from ECT(0), e.g., as
       proposed in [I-D.briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id].  This is at variance
       with RFC 3168's requirement that ECT(0)-marked traffic and ECT(1)-
       marked traffic not receive different treatment.
RATIONALE:
L4S alters both sender and network behaviour, not just network.


Bob
>
> Thanks, --David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 4:52 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-01.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>
>
>          Title           : Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation
>          Author          : David Black
> 	Filename        : draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 10
> 	Date            : 2016-10-25
>
> Abstract:
>     Multiple protocol experiments have been proposed that involve changes
>     to Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) as specified in RFC 3168.
>     This memo summarizes the proposed areas of experimentation to provide
>     an overview to the Internet community and updates RFC 3168, a
>     Proposed Standard RFC, to allow the experiments to proceed without
>     requiring a standards process exception for each Experimental RFC to
>     update RFC 3168.  In addition, this memo makes related updates to the
>     ECN specification for RTP in RFC 6679 for the same reason.  Each
>     experiment is still required to be documented in an Experimental RFC.
>     This memo also records the conclusion of the ECN Nonce experiment in
>     RFC 3540, obsoletes RFC 3540 and reclassifies it as Historic.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-01
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-01
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>
>

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/