Re: [tcpPrague] [tsvwg] FW: I-D Action: draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-00.txt

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Wed, 05 October 2016 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: tcpprague@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpprague@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6136B129751; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 07:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7tBWFJXZfoD; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 07:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137AF1288B8; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 07:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id E43D490AA19; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:27:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 10:27:45 -0400
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
Message-ID: <20161005142745.GK94244@verdi>
References: <147527426837.20369.878763602331124041.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F6B60ED@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F6B60ED@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpprague/ZAAPOPypHobvi2pBkIhXwv4nfQ0>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "tcpPrague@ietf.org" <tcpPrague@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpPrague] [tsvwg] FW: I-D Action: draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpprague@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "To coordinate implementation and standardisation of TCP Prague across platforms. TCP Prague will be an evolution of DCTCP designed to live alongside other TCP variants and derivatives." <tcpprague.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpprague>, <mailto:tcpprague-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpprague/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpprague@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpprague-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpprague>, <mailto:tcpprague-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:27:51 -0000

Black, David <David.Black@dell.com> wrote:
> 
> This is the process-oriented draft on ECN experimentation that I promised
> at the TSVWG meeting in Berlin. Comments are welcome, but please keep
> the process focus in mind - the intent is to leave documentation of the
> actual ECN changes and rationale to the referenced drafts that document
> the ECN experiments.

   Thank you. I have read this draft; and agree it covers what it needs to.

   I note the intended status is "Standards Track". Is this intended for
action by the TSVWG group?

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>