RE: Satellites running IP
"Ahmed, Masuma" <masuma.ahmed@lmco.com> Fri, 14 June 2002 21:39 UTC
Content-return: allowed
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:39:43 -0700
From: "Ahmed, Masuma" <masuma.ahmed@lmco.com>
Subject: RE: Satellites running IP
To: "'Adrian J. Hooke'" <adrian.j.hooke@jpl.nasa.gov>, tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov,
David Carek <David.A.Carek@grc.nasa.gov>
Message-id: <D14BEF7AFC99D3118F6500508B121221078DF4AE@emss01m02.ems.lmco.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Sender: owner-tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1717
Lines: 53
At the present time, to my knowledge there is no existing satellite systems in orbit that supports on-board IP processing and routing. Teledesic has design concepts for IP routing on-board and Astrolink has ATM switching capability on-board. However, none of these systems is flying today. Existing commercial systems like Inmarsat and Cyberstar use IP interface at the ground to support Internet applications but the space itself is transparent to IP. NASA ACTS may be the only one today that supports on-board digital processing (e.g., SONET frames) and not bent pipe transponder systems. regards. masuma ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Dr. Masuma Ahmed Business & Technology Strategy Leader Lockheed Martin, Management and Data Systems, WR 3200 Zanker Road, San Jose, CA 95134 Tel: 408-473-4140 Fax: 408-473-4961 Email: masuma.ahmed@lmco.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian J. Hooke [SMTP:adrian.j.hooke@jpl.nasa.gov] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:56 PM > To: tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov; David Carek > Subject: Re: Satellites running IP > > At 02:56 PM 6/13/2002 -0400, David Carek wrote: > > > I'm looking for existing satellites that use IP or other Internet > protocols on board or in their air to ground communications. If you know > of any currently flying satellites with such capabilities I'd appreciate > the references. > > > David: what problems are you trying to solve, and why? > > At 04:02 PM 6/14/2002 -0400, William Ivancic wrote: > > > ??? I don't understand the comment. I'm taking SCPS-TP end-to-end, > not SCPS-TP as a gateway. > > > And in what operational configurations are you trying to solve them? > > ///adrian >
- Satellites running IP David Carek
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP William Ivancic
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- Re: Satellites running IP William Ivancic
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP William Ivancic
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP Keith Scott
- Re: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- Re: Satellites running IP Eric Travis
- RE: Satellites running IP Ahmed, Masuma
- RE: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP David Carek
- Re: Satellites running IP Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: Satellites running IP David Carek
- Re: Satellites running IP Daniel Shell
- Re: Satellites running IP Eric Travis
- Re: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- RE: Satellites running IP brian.smith
- RE: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- Re: Satellites running IP Daniel Shell
- Re: Satellites running IP Daniel Shell
- Re: Satellites running IP Eric Travis
- RE: Satellites running IP brian.smith