RE: Satellites running IP

"Ahmed, Masuma" <masuma.ahmed@lmco.com> Fri, 14 June 2002 21:39 UTC

Content-return: allowed
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:39:43 -0700
From: "Ahmed, Masuma" <masuma.ahmed@lmco.com>
Subject: RE: Satellites running IP
To: "'Adrian J. Hooke'" <adrian.j.hooke@jpl.nasa.gov>, tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov, David Carek <David.A.Carek@grc.nasa.gov>
Message-id: <D14BEF7AFC99D3118F6500508B121221078DF4AE@emss01m02.ems.lmco.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Sender: owner-tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1717
Lines: 53

At the present time, to my knowledge there is no existing satellite systems
in orbit that supports on-board IP processing and routing.
Teledesic has design concepts for IP routing on-board and Astrolink has ATM
switching capability on-board. However,
none of these systems is flying today. Existing commercial systems like
Inmarsat and Cyberstar use IP interface at the ground 
to support Internet applications but the space itself is transparent to IP.
NASA ACTS may be the only one today that supports
on-board digital processing (e.g., SONET frames) and not bent pipe
transponder systems.

regards.

masuma 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Dr. Masuma Ahmed
Business & Technology Strategy Leader
Lockheed Martin, Management and Data Systems, WR
3200 Zanker Road, San Jose, CA 95134
Tel: 408-473-4140
Fax: 408-473-4961
Email: masuma.ahmed@lmco.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Adrian J. Hooke [SMTP:adrian.j.hooke@jpl.nasa.gov]
> Sent:	Friday, June 14, 2002 1:56 PM
> To:	tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov; David Carek
> Subject:	Re: Satellites running IP
> 
> At 02:56 PM 6/13/2002 -0400, David Carek wrote:
> 
> 
> 	I'm looking for existing satellites that use IP or other Internet
> protocols on board or in their air to ground communications.  If you know
> of any currently flying satellites with such capabilities I'd appreciate
> the references.
> 
> 
> David: what problems are you trying to solve, and why?
> 
> At 04:02 PM 6/14/2002 -0400, William Ivancic wrote:
> 
> 
> 	??? I don't understand the comment.  I'm taking SCPS-TP end-to-end,
> not SCPS-TP as a gateway.
> 
> 
> And in what operational configurations are you trying to solve them?
> 
> ///adrian
>