IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Satellites running IP

"Charlie Younghusband" <cwy@xiphos.ca> Wed, 19 June 2002 18:36 UTC

From: "Charlie Younghusband" <cwy@xiphos.ca>
To: "Smith JR, Harry E" <harry.e.smith.jr@lmco.com>, <tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov>
Subject: RE: Satellites running IP
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 14:36:44 -0400
Message-ID: <PJEPJJEGNDADAJFBNIDFAEPOCBAA.cwy@xiphos.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <C7EE6C1A719FD311B75E00508B1226F00F4FCF25@emss01m03.ems.lmco.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1113
Lines: 40

You and many others on this list following this thread may be interested in
a technical paper "Performance of SCPS-TP in Complex Networks" presented
last month at an AIAA conference.  It can be found at:
http://www.xiphos.ca/files/papers/The_Performance_of_SCPS_in_Complex_Network
s.pdf

Charlie

--
Charlie Younghusband
Network Software Engineering
Xiphos Technologies
514-848-9640 http://www.xiphos.ca/


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov [mailto:owner-tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov]On Behalf
Of Smith JR, Harry E
Sent: June 19, 2002 12:15 PM
To: tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov
Subject: Satellites running IP

I have been following the thread with interest and enjoyment.

However, as a newcomer to the SCPS, is there a technical summary of the
differences and extension of the SCPS Suite to the most common stack ( not
best) Winsock 2.0 ?  Or even any commonly used stack?

Thanks
Harry Smith

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
Harry Smith
l
Systems Engineer Senior Staff
LM MDS/WR  280/4/26

3200 Zanker Road, MS X-75, San Jose, CA. 95134
408 473 6491

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email