Re: Satellites running IP
William Ivancic <wivancic@grc.nasa.gov> Fri, 14 June 2002 15:51 UTC
Message-Id: <4.2.1.20020614113450.00bcec60@popserve.grc.nasa.gov>
X-Sender: caivanc@popserve.grc.nasa.gov
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.1
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:51:53 -0400
To: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>,
David Carek <David.A.Carek@grc.nasa.gov>
From: William Ivancic <wivancic@grc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Satellites running IP
Cc: tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.43.0206141340090.6324-100000@artemis.ee.surrey.
ac.uk>
References: <3D08EADE.7000006@grc.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=====================_4754627==_.ALT"
Sender: owner-tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 3740
Lines: 96
At 01:52 PM 6/14/02 +0100, Lloyd Wood wrote: >On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, David Carek wrote: > > > I'm looking for existing satellites that use IP or other Internet > > protocols on board or in their air to ground communications. ..... > > >Really, isn't this what NASA et al. have been developing SCPS for? > >L. Does anyone know of someone "flying" an onboard SCPS stack? Does anyone know of any commercial applications that call the SCPS-TP options. SCPS-FP is the only application one I know of. Does anyone know of a commercial vendor implementing a SCPS-NP router? To take full advantage of some options in SCPS-TP, one needs as SCPS-NP router. We performed high-speed testing those SCPS options we could test and found no significant performance improvements. The report is being written, but not yet available. The results were presented as the 2nd Space Internet Workshop in June and will be presented at SpaceOps 2002. http://roland.grc.nasa.gov/~ivancic/papers_presentations/papers.html Under PRESENTATIONS "SCPS-TP, TCP and Rate-Based Protocol Evaluation," (Includes multi-flow data) SpaceOps 2002 at Houston, TX, October 9-12, 2002 (Powerpoint) file size 951,808 bytes By the way, SCPS-TP advertises TCP's protocol number for reliable transport protocol selections. It does this even if the pure rate-based transmission is used. IMO, this is terrible as it make QoS and queue management very difficult. I may be putting a rate-based protocol into a WRED queue. Guess who loses. Will
- Satellites running IP David Carek
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP William Ivancic
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- Re: Satellites running IP William Ivancic
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP William Ivancic
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP Keith Scott
- Re: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- Re: Satellites running IP Eric Travis
- RE: Satellites running IP Ahmed, Masuma
- RE: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP David Carek
- Re: Satellites running IP Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: Satellites running IP David Carek
- Re: Satellites running IP Daniel Shell
- Re: Satellites running IP Eric Travis
- Re: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- RE: Satellites running IP brian.smith
- RE: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- Re: Satellites running IP Daniel Shell
- Re: Satellites running IP Daniel Shell
- Re: Satellites running IP Eric Travis
- RE: Satellites running IP brian.smith