Re: Satellites running IP
David Carek <David.A.Carek@grc.nasa.gov> Mon, 17 June 2002 15:04 UTC
Message-ID: <3D0DFA74.7000504@grc.nasa.gov>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 11:04:20 -0400
From: David Carek <David.A.Carek@grc.nasa.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020512 Netscape/7.0b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Adrian J. Hooke" <adrian.j.hooke@jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov
Subject: Re: Satellites running IP
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020614134822.021dfe48@pop.jpl.nasa.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1720
Lines: 37
Adrian J. Hooke wrote: > At 02:56 PM 6/13/2002 -0400, David Carek wrote: > >> I'm looking for existing satellites that use IP or other Internet >> protocols on board or in their air to ground communications. If you >> know of any currently flying satellites with such capabilities I'd >> appreciate the references. > > > David: what problems are you trying to solve, and why? ... > And in what operational configurations are you trying to solve them? I'm trying to identify available options for an IP compliant LEO science satellite, including susbsystem communications on-board as well as command, control, and telemetry to/from ground. Two communications paths would exist: One direct LEO to ground; and one to ground via TDRSS(GEO). A collegue and I have been tasked to write a communications architecute paper for such a system, that uses only Internet protocols end to end. Obviously, mission requirements and budget would ultimately define what is used on a real mission, but this is just a cut at a generic mission. The problem is, that I keep coming up with more reasons not to use Internet protols, than reasons to use them. Having worked on flight software I know the value in minimizing the SLOC count and complexity of flight code. I supposed if a "flight qualified" stack were available, it would be much more readily accepted. I personally like the SCPS specifications, but I've been asked to try to identify options using only current Internet standards. This creates a problem, in that some application level protocol will be necessary ... so I'm kind of back in the non-standards realm. That's why I wanted to see if anybody has already done this, and to what extent.
- Satellites running IP David Carek
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP William Ivancic
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- Re: Satellites running IP William Ivancic
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP William Ivancic
- Re: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP Keith Scott
- Re: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- Re: Satellites running IP Eric Travis
- RE: Satellites running IP Ahmed, Masuma
- RE: Satellites running IP Lloyd Wood
- Re: Satellites running IP David Carek
- Re: Satellites running IP Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: Satellites running IP David Carek
- Re: Satellites running IP Daniel Shell
- Re: Satellites running IP Eric Travis
- Re: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- RE: Satellites running IP brian.smith
- RE: Satellites running IP Adrian J. Hooke
- Re: Satellites running IP Daniel Shell
- Re: Satellites running IP Daniel Shell
- Re: Satellites running IP Eric Travis
- RE: Satellites running IP brian.smith