Re: Satellites running IP
William Ivancic <wivancic@grc.nasa.gov> Thu, 20 June 2002 11:56 UTC
Message-Id: <4.2.1.20020620075223.00bf0100@popserve.grc.nasa.gov>
X-Sender: caivanc@popserve.grc.nasa.gov
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.1
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 07:56:49 -0400
To: kscott@mitre.org (Keith Scott),
harry.e.smith.jr@lmco.com (Smith JR, Harry E)
From: William Ivancic <wivancic@grc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Satellites running IP
Cc: tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020619144520.00ae5d08@mailsrv2.mitre.org>
References: <C7EE6C1A719FD311B75E00508B1226F00F4FCF25@emss01m03.ems.lmc o.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 4391
Lines: 97
Keith, Thanks for the summary. It may be useful to put this summary (the stuff below) on the SCPS site as it is probably a question that comes up often. Reading this summary is much easier that examining the documents. Will >The short answer to your question: what are the differences between TCP >Tranquility and, say, TCP NewReno is that Tranquility provides for a >number of sender-side modifications to TCP behavior, and a number of >negotiated options. The sender-side modifications include: > >1 TCP Tranquility provides for the sender-side to use either VJ- or >Vegas-style congestion control, or none. Obviously, disabling congestion >control is something that should only be done when the Tranquility flow >won't interfere with congestion-controlled flows. There are also paced >acknowledgement modes useful for very highly asymmetric situations. >2 TCP Tranquility includes a sender-side rate control cap on transmission >rate (this can be useful, for example, to prevent the VJ congestion >control algorithm from repeatedly driving the bottleneck link into congestion). > >In addition, TCP Tranquility specifies a number of TCP options, including: > >1 SCPS-Capabilities TCP Option >Used during the SYN exchange to negotiate various TCP Tranquility >capabilities such as SNACK, SCPS Loss-Tolerant Header Compression, Partial >Reliability Service, ...) If a Tranquility endpoint is communicating >with a non-Tranquility endpoint (or another Tranquility stack, for that >matter) that does not agree to use SCPS options, either by not including a >SCPS capabilities option in the SYN exchange or by including a >SCPS-capabilities option that declines all extensions, communications take >place using the standard TCP protocol as specified by RFC 793 and its >supporting RFCs. > >2 Selective Negative Acknowledgements TCP Option >SNACK is a bandwidth-efficient form of NACK useful in moderate to high >error rate environments. > >3 Record Boundary Marking >TCP Tranquility specifies a method for marking record boundaries in the >TCP stream. These record boundaries are indicated at the source and are >carried through to the destination. > >4 Corruption Experienced TCP Option >TCP Tranquility specifies a way to inform a TCP sender that a link in the >path has gone down. This allows the sender to suspend various timers >until the link comes back up. This essentially keeps the sender from >backing off a lot while waiting for the link to come up. > >TCP Tranquility Loss-Tolerant Header Compression >TCP Tranquility specifies a loss-tolerant header compression scheme that >does not use delta encoding, as RFC1144 compression does[1]. The >loss-tolerant header compression generally doesn't achieve the compression >ratios of VJ header compression, but a single corrupted packet does not >prevent decompression of later packets at the receiver. If both ends of >the connection agree to do Tranqility header compression during the SYN >exchange, then the remainder of the connection switches to the TCP >Tranquility IP protocol number (105). > >TCP Tranquility Partial Reliability Service >During the initial SYN exchange, both endpoints may agree to use partial >reliability. This mode of operation allows the sender to 'give up' on >retransmitting data after a specified timeout period. The receiver then >receives a stream with holes in it. Application-layer support to >correctly detect and deal with holes in the received stream is required. > > >If you have any other questions, I'd be happy to answer, > > --keith > > >[1] VJ Header compression (RFC1144) uses delta-encoding, essentially >transmitting the changes to some fields in the TCP/IP headers instead of >the whole values. This can be unfriendly to lossy links because there's >shared state at the link endpoints that, when a packet is corrupted on the >link, becomes inconsistent. This can cause data to fall on the floor >until the source retransmits the lost packet. Things like the twice >algorithm and the header compression for IPv6 try to get around this problem. > ======================================= Will Ivancic NASA Glenn Research Center 21000 Brookpark Road MS 54-5 Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Phone +1 (216)433-3494 Fax +1 (216) 433-8705 Yahoo Instant Messenger ID: ivancic http://roland.grc.nasa.gov/~ivancic
- Satellites running IP Smith JR, Harry E
- RE: Satellites running IP William Ivancic
- RE: Satellites running IP Charlie Younghusband
- Re: Satellites running IP Keith Scott
- Re: Satellites running IP William Ivancic