Re: Satellite Emulators

William Ivancic <wivancic@grc.nasa.gov> Fri, 07 June 2002 07:54 UTC

Message-Id: <4.2.1.20020607035034.00b3cad0@popserve.grc.nasa.gov>
X-Sender: caivanc@popserve.grc.nasa.gov
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.1
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 03:54:35 -0400
To: "Jackson, Gary" <GJackson@tectura.com>, "Tcpsat (E-mail)" <tcpsat@lerc.nasa.gov>
From: William Ivancic <wivancic@grc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Satellite Emulators
In-Reply-To: <B133E409DF471045A9278DCDD0C90440310DEB@tectura-mail.tectur a.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-tcpsat@grc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 847
Lines: 38

ONE may fit your needs.

http://irg.cs.ohiou.edu/one/

One can do variable delay.

We use the Adtech SX/14 routinely.  It is very nice.

I also have an HP ATM Broadband Series Test Set (BSTS) with an impairment 
module that does ATM payload and header error and packet loss as well as 
jutter.


Good Luck,

Will





At 10:35 AM 5/15/02 -0700, Jackson, Gary wrote:
>I am part of a group building a proof-of-concept lab for some new
>services. We are soliciting opinions about satellite emulators,
>specifically with variable bandwidth, latency, jitter, and packet loss.
>We have looked at the Shunra offering, and are also considering "rolling
>our own". Are there any other suggestions or comments?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Gary Jackson
>Senior Network Engineer
>Tectura Corporation
>14205 S.E. 36th Street
>Suite 200
>Bellevue, WA 98006
>(425) 957-4270
>