Re: [teas-3272bis-design-team] 答复: 3272biss and YANG

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 07 March 2019 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97F7120106 for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 06:48:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Eus+dAG8; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=jey3ctgB
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63LoRWT5S1jS for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 06:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2903912008F for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 06:48:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4928; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1551970131; x=1553179731; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Qq/T52GsRh3Ye3Nk2nKprXx1lD40LKaoMLDwE4UM2XY=; b=Eus+dAG8JKb7mqCWB5mCPAab2FYyHdBQ5PM+nGCwpIswhFupQB5uDIky XSfNmyDuQq4b6kN77MPK/1bol8Wt/hirPpcmMpCxOJO0R1MM2meMqiRdA vi/BDmsZg3Sl1cR4aQZQVQsAtYATwD4gkGVn2A+h5RIH112n1901oG5jz M=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:kPMoJBV0D+WzVqlTeIJypviDflLV8LGuZFwc94YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSANiJ8OpK3uzRta2oGXcN55qMqjgjSNRNTFdEwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/Zic3EexJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AWAACgLoFc/5NdJa1kGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBVAIBAQEBCwGBPFADaHQECycKg3+DRwOPL0qBaCWYN4EQA1QLAQEYCwmEQAIXhB4iNwYNAQEDAQEHAQMCbRwMhUoBAQEBAgEBASERDAEBLAwLBAIBBgIRBAEBAQICIwMCAgIlCxQBBQMIAgQBEhuDBwGBXQMNCAECDI5ykF8CihRxgS+CeAEBBYUAGIILAwWBCyQBiysXgX+BOAwTgkyDHgEBgS4BCwcBNhWCXjGCJoc7gkADSIIDhDeTFwkCjwOBVYIrGYF4hWaDSIgPgmSIDZI4AgQCBAUCDQEBBYFdImVxcBU7KgGCQYIKDBctgx6FFIU/coEoihwPF4EIAYEeAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,451,1544486400"; d="scan'208";a="529171883"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2019 14:48:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x27EmnFn029756 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Mar 2019 14:48:49 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 08:48:49 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 08:48:48 -0600
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 08:48:48 -0600
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Qq/T52GsRh3Ye3Nk2nKprXx1lD40LKaoMLDwE4UM2XY=; b=jey3ctgBP8w92EJ6U0x7YHr5/Y6sUJ4NH23KxibWUVvTn/AM5eGCKn+0EotUeZcnJgwUomc2uGIoKdyeBjwVNTeTEpFPTR0sPIikmgviSr/e6rKmQ0aguKTiBulVQcphPHliVKpGd3vbFARR8H/8Gvh55/bzziBAaWZNcyNkD1o=
Received: from BN8PR11MB3683.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.220.74) by BN8PR11MB3809.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.221.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1686.18; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 14:48:47 +0000
Received: from BN8PR11MB3683.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c62:f0b7:72a0:e853]) by BN8PR11MB3683.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c62:f0b7:72a0:e853%4]) with mapi id 15.20.1686.018; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 14:48:47 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org" <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [teas-3272bis-design-team] 答复: 3272biss and YANG
Thread-Index: AQHU1Nh70Ak4zljxIEKLUfGL4lu3raYAK48A///AqgA=
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 14:48:47 +0000
Message-ID: <6100A065-79F2-4EFC-9257-3DF820322B51@cisco.com>
References: <1dc968ad-ed74-c058-a5f3-f098442c07ce@pi.nu> <018701d4d4c1$904da010$b0e8e030$@org.cn> <VI1PR07MB50406F2706E7681A23C84E61F04C0@VI1PR07MB5040.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <3611_1551957906_5C80FF92_3611_181_1_a4352131-ae50-4c5a-0a32-6748539424ae@orange.com> <VI1PR07MB50403113D750FC5DF0B1926EF04C0@VI1PR07MB5040.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR07MB50403113D750FC5DF0B1926EF04C0@VI1PR07MB5040.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.94]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d86f46b6-cfac-4c26-da59-08d6a30c013e
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600127)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN8PR11MB3809;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR11MB3809:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;BN8PR11MB3809;23: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
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR11MB380962DECE5326E89EA99817C24C0@BN8PR11MB3809.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 096943F07A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(396003)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(13464003)(199004)(189003)(53936002)(26005)(476003)(5024004)(256004)(6506007)(14444005)(6246003)(186003)(2616005)(86362001)(11346002)(6512007)(486006)(2201001)(966005)(446003)(76176011)(3846002)(71190400001)(478600001)(83716004)(25786009)(6306002)(14454004)(6436002)(6116002)(102836004)(99286004)(81156014)(81166006)(71200400001)(53546011)(6346003)(2906002)(5660300002)(6486002)(2501003)(97736004)(316002)(305945005)(106356001)(105586002)(93886005)(224303003)(110136005)(7736002)(36756003)(68736007)(82746002)(8936002)(66066001)(229853002)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN8PR11MB3809; H:BN8PR11MB3683.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: h8Jg0jYCt+lGa+EehCoszCNewCs3gCycQ/s5GH3IVljrQvQbNltgAd84IciP9lUQtKugpdKZESjXnDAVB3Vumr47jA/fBI7eUbVcu3ifCjYVMhHY6rD5C/pe5Zd+uc0jMnhH404xIMKmcvaybpIF8/yDouXbKvU8OPmkKVw0Al3x60NH6nOZ0KNA67Ichhu/sgEGo1IbAHkKMr7oY2YpgSlWsaHWzv/RoMvBm9TWd158om3Wk7oRDStpV2ppmEs+SzX+AHzohY5bQW8WqqcZdr6+HSrjCcSf1rS7ggNVStIYpfgQV4ouBrRKhGsXt+wwiArajcjrSvDP/Hdq7PtRel1zDvsh7W8LBaip6QjBfCPacd7c5RcRPVCk4X5PGQqgkHJnxw3WxKV7pqalrR9SCO477n54XSaUxL7oLLNIvp0=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CBE28035FDC657469E2B1FCEA81174B0@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d86f46b6-cfac-4c26-da59-08d6a30c013e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Mar 2019 14:48:47.3273 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR11MB3809
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas-3272bis-design-team/0gmGNIj1OMd3ZvIaWO6WpyHBH4Y>
Subject: Re: [teas-3272bis-design-team] 答复: 3272biss and YANG
X-BeenThere: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <teas-3272bis-design-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas-3272bis-design-team>, <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas-3272bis-design-team/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-3272bis-design-team>, <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 14:48:54 -0000

One benefit of the original document was to provide references. I believe this is what the BIS should do as well. So, we'd provide a brief overview of YANG TE provisioning and then point to the reference models. 

Thanks,
Acee

On 3/7/19, 8:37 AM, "Teas-3272bis-design-team on behalf of Daniele Ceccarelli" <teas-3272bis-design-team-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> wrote:

    That's why i said "there is plenty" and not "everyone" 😊
    
    Jokes apart, even if it is 10% it's worth covering it IMO.
    
    Cheers
    
    Daniele  
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Teas-3272bis-design-team <teas-3272bis-design-team-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of julien.meuric@orange.com
    Sent: den 7 mars 2019 12:24
    To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org
    Subject: Re: [teas-3272bis-design-team] 答复: 3272biss and YANG
    
    Hi Daniele,
    
    > In hierarchical SDN all the traffic engineering is done with Restconf
    + YANG.
    
    Not entirely true either. Ever read RFC 6805 or 7491? ;-b
    
    Julien
    
    
    On 07/03/2019 11:33, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
    > Well this is not entirely true.
    > There is plenty of YANG Models for traffic engineering. TE-topology, TE-tunnel, TE-mapping...just to mention some of them.
    > In hierarchical SDN all the traffic engineering is done with Restconf + YANG.
    > I agree with Loa, it would be probably good to have at least a section dedicated to YANG.
    > BR
    >
    > Daniele
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Teas-3272bis-design-team 
    > <teas-3272bis-design-team-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
    > Sent: den 7 mars 2019 09:42
    >
    > Yang is not closely related to the TE solution. Should we pay more attention to other emerged TE solutions for various environments?
    >
    >
    > Best Regards.
    >
    > Aijun Wang
    > Network R&D and Operation Support Department China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China.
    >
    > -----邮件原件-----
    > 发件人: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu]
    > 发送时间: 2019年3月7日 15:45
    >
    >
    > All,
    >
    > When 3272 was published, YANG modelling ws not over the horizon, is there anything we need to say in 3272bis about YANG?
    >
    > /Loa
    >
    
    
    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    
    Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
    
    This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
    If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
    As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
    Thank you.
    
    --
    Teas-3272bis-design-team mailing list
    Teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-3272bis-design-team