[Teas-3272bis-design-team] Resend of my original post

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 28 January 2019 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4EC13107E for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:06:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQgz7w70oz2D for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:06:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB71013107A for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:05:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0SH5vd0004942 for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:05:57 GMT
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5332207E for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:05:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9220022040 for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:05:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.189.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0SH5u7H013581 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:05:57 GMT
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:05:57 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <012701d4b72b$bd114790$3733d6b0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdS3KzYrDQQ5gXPwQrWKnEzaOxTuUQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.189.92
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24396.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.049-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--3.049-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24396.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--3.049100-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: VZz6+2A6wpqcmtrRK7tMe6mukiZOfPi2b2PJffiTNm6W+zaNLK605PC1 la2SSTU006QU4xqeQBSDZ7J7xj+KAZ4JPQewVPBvW7gz/Gbgpl4hmbYg1ZcOnk+0uGVOF08Qcsx FLHbqBOJ0pShrYlZKh67/DgyoTvL023VYYdhWQETmAId+2bAQwn0tCKdnhB58vqq8s2MNhPAL4K bF8qbADAzKt8/2P4LVJ0RPnyOnrZImpyejhOVraDG2o45Un7tnxyZ4LlyXS1qdHtQ3cIzNga9Ds Kt3gtaysdlxswMRF7Y3jYKJoP9AmYaWMcvTy7OFA2w17xOZV45N/vQcxQpFczQFvN82A8P79TpQ iD8Sn4s54DEQIK3XhMn5FmnhuafQ
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas-3272bis-design-team/6c5S2Yh_0EKiMrZKhdq5nOz8c9w>
Subject: [Teas-3272bis-design-team] Resend of my original post
X-BeenThere: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <teas-3272bis-design-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas-3272bis-design-team>, <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas-3272bis-design-team/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-3272bis-design-team>, <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:06:05 -0000

Hi,

I sent this to your individual email addresses on Friday. This re-send just
because I know that sometime bulk emails get filtered.

Best,
Adrian

===

Hi Team!

Our dedicated mailing list should be up soon, but in the meantime this
email.

I'll send out a Doodle Poll to try to pick a time when we can attempt a
voice call to work out how we should approach this task.

Until then, it would really help if you could all refresh your memories by
reading RFC 3272 to get a feeling for the scope that it had. Your homework
is to make some lists:
-	What is no longer correct in 3272?
-	In what ways should the scope of 3272 be widened?
-	What new technologies should be added to our draft?
-	What old technologies should be deprecated to historic footnotes?
-	What more recent architecture RFCs and applicability RFCs can
reference and so save ourselves lots of writing?

We can discuss the lists when we meet. For now, it will produce a better
survey if we don't share our lists until we have all done this exercise.

Thanks for volunteering.

Best,
Adrian