Re: [teas-3272bis-design-team] 答复: 3272biss and YANG

<julien.meuric@orange.com> Thu, 07 March 2019 11:25 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889CE1313EF for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 03:25:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.29
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3uQsDumdAcdC for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 03:25:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from orange.com (mta239.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1627813142C for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 03:25:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfedar06.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.8]) by opfedar20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 44FSwL3XLMz8tb7 for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 12:25:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.23]) by opfedar06.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 44FSwL2lG1z3wbH for <teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 12:25:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILM32.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.31.32) by OPEXCAUBM41.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.13.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 12:25:06 +0100
Received: from [10.193.71.36] (10.168.234.4) by OPEXCLILM32.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.31.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 12:25:05 +0100
To: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org
References: <1dc968ad-ed74-c058-a5f3-f098442c07ce@pi.nu> <018701d4d4c1$904da010$b0e8e030$@org.cn> <VI1PR07MB50406F2706E7681A23C84E61F04C0@VI1PR07MB5040.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <3611_1551957906_5C80FF92_3611_181_1_a4352131-ae50-4c5a-0a32-6748539424ae@orange.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 12:23:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR07MB50406F2706E7681A23C84E61F04C0@VI1PR07MB5040.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: [10.168.234.4]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas-3272bis-design-team/LccixTTjPWirDIrvGhmhuLa1JzU>
Subject: Re: [teas-3272bis-design-team] 答复: 3272biss and YANG
X-BeenThere: teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <teas-3272bis-design-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas-3272bis-design-team>, <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas-3272bis-design-team/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-3272bis-design-team>, <mailto:teas-3272bis-design-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 11:25:13 -0000

Hi Daniele,

> In hierarchical SDN all the traffic engineering is done with Restconf
+ YANG.

Not entirely true either. Ever read RFC 6805 or 7491? ;-b

Julien


On 07/03/2019 11:33, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
> Well this is not entirely true.
> There is plenty of YANG Models for traffic engineering. TE-topology, TE-tunnel, TE-mapping...just to mention some of them.
> In hierarchical SDN all the traffic engineering is done with Restconf + YANG.
> I agree with Loa, it would be probably good to have at least a section dedicated to YANG.
> BR
>
> Daniele  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teas-3272bis-design-team <teas-3272bis-design-team-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
> Sent: den 7 mars 2019 09:42
>
> Yang is not closely related to the TE solution. Should we pay more attention to other emerged TE solutions for various environments?
>
>
> Best Regards.
>
> Aijun Wang
> Network R&D and Operation Support Department China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China.
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu]
> 发送时间: 2019年3月7日 15:45
>
>
> All,
>
> When 3272 was published, YANG modelling ws not over the horizon, is there anything we need to say in 3272bis about YANG?
>
> /Loa
>


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.