[Teas-ns-dt] Isolation text in appendix of definition draft

Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com> Thu, 25 June 2020 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39533A0C25 for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a-7tXaPjynLr for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam11on2044.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.220.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B5073A0C06 for <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Yb/yTImYiNURsbTeDGtXiZRGlgJV4Hifj4XpesHuHzroQMlKRsD/5CuB5RC2TaPHszxHw2e9qlcvNTB/RyE3aq9fGUlmymLP8NJDuSv2Tj5umNnWnm+43DkIoI28qPTVxaFMPP7xBEVpxJyIoIF8J3biSZ9rqggs4np3w3Og5LXEw3BBKr1tcVZgeCHMhK9zwgB2c1vgsqMvPM7KgJ/icdUPOpy10rMAXHDbY6PU0qWTPwTdwktDSmf8Ffm+GdVeiGfyA/FHv0GnMgYoHCbeycg+y954+5qMoX0EgDn4SJL7AgC/OA1LM79/qE4LdAPCYxQbxjbmd6HulALzSCAoIQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cE8gcchSq1HlWOQPsMPiu66C6oknlS4Lt5fpofhsY4U=; b=PT/qoYnxUP1YcLB33yR1ND5mfRxEU91SzMBEhZIYwZSMe/b3hufFZHOvj1XGB0Kwc3ACOcSAmS9lyQ1v/sKgSJHH9xqWrJDPAjm15Ipij/oAIGCKwk69d2iQ+xxnigxfmO2AhggZaDSPNLCSNafnQBmtYkbHsRYir8EEM25Zu3FcXGVyXxYRf364aod6hwbHpfF5PsZKIk0avTOhjTLEV0bVkDZEUUs5LBPXbRx7lODaNkxkt+wetw1CXiNqCGqCQrc3y7+jq1icRSNqm6txXjkIBY8r6Bxqy+TbmsequlJcryJxOAJI6syZ8E/tD0ADrr+1FyMrgF8wzymvMm5RqQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cE8gcchSq1HlWOQPsMPiu66C6oknlS4Lt5fpofhsY4U=; b=ILnGSm7O6nEz4/Zmio0LgSwl/rA5bNGAguI9OPIrwhPS0MpPoBsu8XPrpye5RNNOk8R7kQGK+B3U71hXq+RTnPSQSzKXRWdAlAhyl38PLlDYgqfAx3xOGMOrFZdJwoMrlzi+voBWBOGMPRJwQHYIEu9Nit5Wi99InKsf/Nkw7RA=
Received: from MN2PR15MB3103.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:f9::10) by MN2PR15MB3070.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:f8::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.22; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:19:32 +0000
Received: from MN2PR15MB3103.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6dab:2470:4c23:1471]) by MN2PR15MB3103.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6dab:2470:4c23:1471%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:19:32 +0000
From: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
To: "teas-ns-dt@ietf.org" <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Isolation text in appendix of definition draft
Thread-Index: AdZLCj3qcrgUgSfpTpKLZjbA0ZA1mQ==
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:19:31 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR15MB3103F7A1F511EEB6FAEB959697920@MN2PR15MB3103.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [129.192.79.10]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2b815db9-5d05-4ec4-0b31-08d819238b22
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR15MB3070:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR15MB3070D8EFD16E60D7F5C4C83197920@MN2PR15MB3070.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0445A82F82
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: i5ge3WOta7Qrh9GJcgpkCac5uzn/OcIN8gzJMjDRynhTrA6rRr6OB3tgEXvfC2WQ29JdDJ6NoY7VsGkLAmdGVaK0cZQUZK951NpgykMJxpThY2Qg4HsA5UGfbS9G9ER0qaa3hu/+tI9a6zaUU3lndweIgErBvbxD4RsiqSQZkLmtgg8sTb/jmYIBMxvDKOyyRx05Rk9vO+JBydka2hFJsz14cWkXGuvWgXB8xYbnmgNM1r7AUnyGRE9SaLsgdnCBu0WKRL0LQmh05A1zB4wfnWdL5XtzF8sUqepV9OBm+EerqN9A0IYPPQ4voW81sQSZI/zMW4HLTcBrnJZYDxVeVw==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR15MB3103.namprd15.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(66446008)(66556008)(64756008)(66476007)(66946007)(2906002)(86362001)(5660300002)(52536014)(6506007)(76116006)(7696005)(71200400001)(26005)(316002)(8676002)(186003)(44832011)(55016002)(8936002)(6916009)(478600001)(33656002)(83380400001)(9686003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: TYL5YQllUIOwW5oRKvLCqcJFhsVPEzKdrHhwyoHVMyz/4o97svKfzBiiZ7N/BHS3OqS+ip+SpoDfYFedTNvxghxafyf8huEvL1w/4m2nMcGUtTPRvJUcmJ2mfG+ot0rFt1Hw6rloz1oE1+JlEvmQkZ2iyknxhJ30EXzVHM9O5WGxk1d0eVB8UnwEKXGJ/sbPPR9bNc38kxiEDtaXPCgMR9o04sTQV+nZXcjzF2+dz4WZuMhsdmCpeYFAUdcs93bYz1N5pWP5nxo3q4y1T+kRKtuc4d1jROeEzXrG+9PCKYuMbpFcfAI1sr89sO+LNMWwNGgt7sf8zW85m5RGz3785ji3oFknR25GRwybathfbJmMx65YO7yZFJd1UTPOaCC5vTdecs927qhlTsT77hYiY4NQLCmrGmPa+DbO3IPfG5BqMtiSxdBDc5nSO0At5PNWxw3aA8rV7+DKTJJlcVYC4R5R/5jSKrnpEcaLUui98ZE=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR15MB3103F7A1F511EEB6FAEB959697920MN2PR15MB3103namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2b815db9-5d05-4ec4-0b31-08d819238b22
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Jun 2020 16:19:31.7631 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 5lHQLfzG2uMJxyquX8l2iwhgdvcp3S5N1z7lcmMxOVmzROCUaQWxRcl+eIRqvbu46rps9ydKcao9KsjEcmxl/g==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR15MB3070
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas-ns-dt/3YffUmjZqsVYli3G41EQFVvhdto>
Subject: [Teas-ns-dt] Isolation text in appendix of definition draft
X-BeenThere: teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TEAS Network Slicing Design Team <teas-ns-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas-ns-dt>, <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas-ns-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-ns-dt>, <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:19:37 -0000

Folks,

I had a plan to suggest for this text, but I think there was not overwhelming interest in moving this to the Framework draft.  Plus we ran out of time.

If we were going to move it, my suggestion was to add a new subsection in the Framework draft under the current section 2 (Transport Slice Objectives) - probably with the heading "2.1 Isolation" that includes the agreed text from the current appendix in the definition draft.  In the definition draft, we would then remove the appendix entirely, and add a new paragraph to current section 4.1.2 (Other Objectives) that says "Also, isolation objectives (see [I-D.nsdt-teas-ns-framework] for more information) may also be necessary to meet some Transport Slice requests."

I have a very slight issue with leaving an appendix in the definitions draft, because it may leave some readers with the impression that this is an open issue.  But I am essentially okay if we decide to leave it as is.  I would suggest - if we do that - that we add a similar new paragraph to section 4.1.2 that points to the appendix.

--
Eric