IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas-ns-dt] REMINDER: Call today Thursday at 6PM CET

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Fri, 03 April 2020 03:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEB43A0D60 for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 20:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M4tBXGqTNPQP for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 20:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A39523A0597 for <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 20:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 707B593097EBDEFB0F21 for <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 04:29:08 +0100 (IST)
Received: from dggeme701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.97) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 04:29:08 +0100
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) by dggeme701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:29:05 +0800
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:29:05 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "teas-ns-dt@ietf.org" <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: REMINDER: Call today Thursday at 6PM CET
Thread-Index: AQHWCNXMMOnwwEKuq0ew6pTvENjpGKhmPfGAgAB2GGA=
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 03:29:05 +0000
Message-ID: <d82242505d1d48e6b1443876cae60647@huawei.com>
References: <62CD7F20-E6A7-4558-8EF4-EE960EE020EF@ericsson.com> <57DD6BC0-6CBC-4AA9-B7EE-0076D58D9EC0@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <57DD6BC0-6CBC-4AA9-B7EE-0076D58D9EC0@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.203.211]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas-ns-dt/NxrP_Yb5l7Q5OugP2xoYhj4AeV8>
Subject: Re: [Teas-ns-dt] REMINDER: Call today Thursday at 6PM CET
X-BeenThere: teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TEAS Network Slicing Design Team <teas-ns-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas-ns-dt>, <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas-ns-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-ns-dt>, <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 03:29:12 -0000

Hi Jari, 

Thanks for uploading the notes of yesterday's meeting.

Regarding the discussion about VPN+ draft, I'd like to add something to the notes:

"Jie mentioned that in the VPN+ framework draft, besides the candidate technologies, there are other sections about the requirement, architecture, and considerations on various aspects, some of which are now referenced by the design team framework  draft. If the candidate technologies are splitted out as a separate document, does this mean the other sections need to be merged with the design team framework draft? John said that in that case, need to compare the content of the two drafts and see how to combine them together. "

Hope this helps.

Best regards,
Jie

-----Original Message-----
From: Teas-ns-dt [mailto:teas-ns-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 12:49 AM
To: teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Teas-ns-dt] REMINDER: Call today Thursday at 6PM CET

Here are the notes:
https://github.com/teas-wg/teas-ns-dt/blob/master/notes/notes-2020-04-02.md

Jari
    

-- 
Teas-ns-dt mailing list
Teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-ns-dt

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email