Re: [Teas-ns-dt] REMINDER: TEAS NS DT Recurring Thursday Meeting

Shunsuke Homma <s.homma0718@gmail.com> Mon, 10 February 2020 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <s.homma0718@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B296E12008C for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 17:49:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7L4Lu1yefy3C for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 17:49:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07AC3120089 for <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 17:49:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id n21so5761101ioo.10 for <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 17:49:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4TJhwoZT/Ry3TmR4FFzykVnvcZb6tkmvmeibqHKTmOY=; b=RUcWMymj/jb9juKnF2J0bbAmJMt4s91YW3GIrlzN993jglrPrm/5+A4RZko3ZVYxL5 3h7bbzBbWcjCdQ6a4NvKtPmUQdXs3IB+tfrXj5lnH5GeTc867MOiTNIxgnc5DK2QRS/I daT28G2ahOpGgykM/TRlwuZixSgsicVn47r4HxZnfVrnfmszzX6Knp0neW9fsTrAIJFx FR6sPUF54v6enF+W1kRiOdJqZ7a3NjzaFLu97o1Q0h/UbTn2EGNNqOXLYvcYn0jOdoVT b1FkYI5xH+rwvlyRNS+830kFoxEimqzaUm0/G3/aSKsTeMpSfwbrbr9QfsrKxxBs/z7B kQFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4TJhwoZT/Ry3TmR4FFzykVnvcZb6tkmvmeibqHKTmOY=; b=PTtnZYEZ6PSINr0Y8XqOtwozm3V5OQ96PJhrQjXYhCWWNPCgc4H8Quy/CBkCH6yKMD i/7LWRm8nZQzhzvB2iJNpK5I2TCpMhW3qo7GQCbWQb8cah2OinsA7f4gQDd+I9saAvj/ Nq29hzd4JYB3Ot0iHTvVb1Axdk+R/hNM7GVWanoeeXtYjJo6WTf+z98G/pAQTjBryqkx Ol0tzJZfOkwB+kcf586aYBYfecRwqL/fonbomC5kt+lQjB3gcu38oWYPguOzP0Jvy0kL VL4G4h8ckfD1g1QzQUxJhNRY8na3Cc2ezebHvic+8Ox92gRzHT6jB1itHsQCegz+uabS jzsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWDOyYGn4sixGRKZFT7MYp2p0rt/Y8knEoFScy/LEM+Dt0ow2AR QogzbSWICHm7d2mVEzUf2J6+EJsCiNjbMNx3JBA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxWVLDjoDTnjiKtoYON08uo3wAF4oldjSm2YOLdBf/AnE2U5RA1o2Iw1qOfx+IDp/y8C7JTSUbPXOLAqn6g26Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cd12:: with SMTP id g18mr8188353jaq.76.1581299374219; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 17:49:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <07042513-445D-4650-858C-53B8F52E9491@ericsson.com> <DM6PR13MB24425F578492C52782E9143ED91D0@DM6PR13MB2442.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <7584837F-AC79-4F3A-AED3-964DCFFC352A@ericsson.com> <CAGU6MPfv-YXzYotMU30HMbWHERNiVAWFBiK525trNfg=U+YGnA@mail.gmail.com> <BL0PR05MB51218DE0B31102D843BA2CA7C71C0@BL0PR05MB5121.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAGU6MPcZvwHQmW49yOf9jgaxwcv3b4UgcroM9bi5pbTh4OtYUA@mail.gmail.com> <BL0PR05MB5121263932C952AF20B5E124C71F0@BL0PR05MB5121.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <BL0PR05MB51219D81194CE860F77F72B7C71F0@BL0PR05MB5121.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR05MB51219D81194CE860F77F72B7C71F0@BL0PR05MB5121.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Shunsuke Homma <s.homma0718@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 10:49:23 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGU6MPehkdcUTQ+p36g4OvnfFWvi2n-69fjsCJpgdnd3+_oHXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
Cc: John E Drake <jdrake=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Kiran Makhijani <kiranm@futurewei.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "teas-ns-dt@ietf.org" <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007be5dd059e2ef347"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas-ns-dt/PNRJKqSsGb2p6tTkOnUNcGBenvg>
Subject: Re: [Teas-ns-dt] REMINDER: TEAS NS DT Recurring Thursday Meeting
X-BeenThere: teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TEAS Network Slicing Design Team <teas-ns-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas-ns-dt>, <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas-ns-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-ns-dt>, <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 01:49:37 -0000

Hi John,

Thank you for elaborating your thought. I got it.

We can add supplementary text explaining follows:
 - the labels in the figure mean just numbering of endpoints.
 - all of endpoints on the same slice may belong to the same address space.
 - there is direct connectivity between any pair

Regards,

Shunsuke


On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 12:02 AM John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> wrote:

> Nevermind, that was nonsensical.
>
>
>
> Having the labels for the left side endpoints and the right side endpoints
> come out of the same address space would work.  I.e., there are M
> endpoints, some on the left and some on the right, and there is direct
> connectivity between any pair.
>
>
>
> Yours Irrespectively,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* Teas-ns-dt <teas-ns-dt-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *John E
> Drake
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 8, 2020 9:53 AM
> *To:* Shunsuke Homma <s.homma0718@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Kiran Makhijani <kiranm@futurewei.com>; Jari Arkko <jari.arkko=
> 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Teas-ns-dt] REMINDER: TEAS NS DT Recurring Thursday
> Meeting
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The simplest fix would be to make the labels on the right set of endpoints
> match the labels on the left set of endpoints.
>
>
>
> Yours Irrespectively,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* Shunsuke Homma <s.homma0718@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 7, 2020 11:30 PM
> *To:* John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
> *Cc:* Jari Arkko <jari.arkko=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Kiran
> Makhijani <kiranm@futurewei.com>; teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Teas-ns-dt] REMINDER: TEAS NS DT Recurring Thursday
> Meeting
>
>
>
> Hi John,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> What the figure shows are the following points:
> - transport slice provides connectivity fulfilling specific SLOs among
> endpoints.
> - endpoints may be distributed in several networks and transport slice can
> be established across multiple networks.
>
> The reason why endpoints seems to be separated is that the endpoints are
> distributed in the underlay networks. There are no other intentions.
>
> If you don't like the figure, can you share your image as ascii or ppt
> format? Or I can invite you to collaborator to edit xml directly if you
> prefer.
>
> Regards,
>
> Shunsuke
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 1:00 AM John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I don’t think figure 2 is correct because it seems to be making a
> distinction between the endpoints on the left and the endpoints on the
> right, like a switch.  I thought the definition was describing a MP2MP
> construct, i.e., any to any connectivity, with possibly different SLOs
> between specific endpoint pairs.
>
>
>
> Yours Irrespectively,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* Teas-ns-dt <teas-ns-dt-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Shunsuke
> Homma
> *Sent:* Friday, February 7, 2020 4:21 AM
> *To:* Jari Arkko <jari.arkko=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Cc:* Kiran Makhijani <kiranm@futurewei.com>; teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Teas-ns-dt] REMINDER: TEAS NS DT Recurring Thursday
> Meeting
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I pushed the latest definition draft which was shared from Kiran to NS-DT
> github repo.
>
>
> https://github.com/teas-wg/teas-ns-dt/blob/master/definitions/draft-rokui-teas-transport-slice-definition-00.txt
>
>
>
>
> You can find diffs from the previous version in the following page..
>
>
> https://github.com/teas-wg/teas-ns-dt/commit/e13258a41772e7ee4f4027710db8f8e2a32e5c30
>
>
>
>
> Your further feedback would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> And if you need, I can upload md and xml format files as well.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Shunsuke
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:41 AM Jari Arkko <jari.arkko=
> 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> *>*We have had some good review discussions on definitions document. If
> you think it’s worth going through the document, we (authors) would like to
> do that in today’s meeting:
>
> >1. to show the recent changes (based on comments)
>
> >2. Feedback on level of detail on a particular topic
>
> >3. more importantly to get feedback if something is missing.
>
>
>
> That sounds great, thank you. Lets do that!
>
>
>
> Jari
>
>
>
> --
> Teas-ns-dt mailing list
> Teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-ns-dt
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-ns-dt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XABgEwdEmcdgEu-E0Vw-tYjr__NZ5sPU__2MJYqVT9beHpDVvG-aATHCa5udkYg$>
>
>