Re: [Teas-ns-dt] Isolation text in appendix of definition draft

[Kiran Makhijani <[e-mail]>]

Hi Eric,
If you don’t mind I can work with you to bringing it in framework and I anyway intended to glue the orphaned Appendix to Realization section but 4.1.2 is also a good place.

Regards
Kiran

________________________________
From: Teas-ns-dt <[e-mail]> on behalf of Eric Gray <eric.gray=[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 9:19:31 AM
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Teas-ns-dt] Isolation text in appendix of definition draft


Folks,



I had a plan to suggest for this text, but I think there was not overwhelming interest in moving this to the Framework draft.  Plus we ran out of time.



If we were going to move it, my suggestion was to add a new subsection in the Framework draft under the current section 2 (Transport Slice Objectives) – probably with the heading “2.1 Isolation” that includes the agreed text from the current appendix in the definition draft.  In the definition draft, we would then remove the appendix entirely, and add a new paragraph to current section 4.1.2 (Other Objectives) that says “Also, isolation objectives (see [I-D.nsdt-teas-ns-framework] for more information) may also be necessary to meet some Transport Slice requests.”



I have a very slight issue with leaving an appendix in the definitions draft, because it may leave some readers with the impression that this is an open issue.  But I am essentially okay if we decide to leave it as is.  I would suggest – if we do that – that we add a similar new paragraph to section 4.1.2 that points to the appendix.



--

Eric