Re: [Teas-ns-dt] Alignment between definition and framework drafts
John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Fri, 20 March 2020 19:14 UTC
Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB443A0D01
for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=juniper.net header.b=zKsDgiMA;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=juniper.net header.b=ZNTZ9Ml+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id I5gvOlYVZW53 for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com
[208.84.65.16])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD82A3A0CE1
for <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108158.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id
02KJ9OVH028860; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:14:14 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net;
h=from : to : cc :
subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type :
mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=qd5zrKIPT/WlDfmYl7zTX+Fo9OESMLxkod0+FQ9u0TY=;
b=zKsDgiMA731asqgbjViNDO1S5gWwh/zhnn+qqnATMKjboxv0C04jnSSPpQmeuerrA9au
EcTT+6GjQPJbKrcT5Q9G9BAdaQYsBkDgg3Jt6an/PdtPmZ5wKDR3V20ECmOIbdKFXT27
e1YHUIUaudSGP/KvxxgZ01PDZLm+/UCL7xctQlqVLUcP0k8W6dHjtIP1XpG1w+Za5oL9
9wCXUUfOAUOMydFBIZ1mUGmCVA84wEuQbo2yX+y0u7eAj9mj24OBddce+u1SLv4hcNx7
QFVqzwl8VZ17TH1cE8dTLnZnjPdaOi+KeT5wod+ZZWWlQd8aCo/7Z7EhyX4WlR44bTQL TQ==
Received: from nam12-bn8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
(mail-bn8nam12lp2170.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.55.170])
by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yu8376g8d-1
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:14:13 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none;
b=Fx5Nw+bY3OsHXZvZL37x0T3/O1+g7ykNZgbE5/vkvhI+bY5Zt4tJIY4SGaYv7ks/OU1qrLyaxbiP91zClkpySJ5oAE4ZJRXbTH+ao8mIpoRyPRwcsqGZI0iZqgBvUc+tzD0MD3zwNh7vGvaPOHTu792+4y41qhpqFKB5evLgiC9Zw1Q5Ka0Nek4QKM2bbg4ilRLNYwpubEt+GLk1VtEhS8UBou8/C0cbw3d96slYOmIWMFghT7x8LVbjNqqn89mu8MVyEeGqB0Br2lqS8rz0i7p33T53Jr06fUtiKm/LfBAtfdiAzjZzeu6Aq8nh3jgZOZIOkLou/UsHowwJTVZ6rg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;
s=arcselector9901;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
bh=qd5zrKIPT/WlDfmYl7zTX+Fo9OESMLxkod0+FQ9u0TY=;
b=KFnl8IcP1cTq4d/SCVqP9AdW/brrUXGZBR8J+6IDNjUVdxQXgQBcB9Ohv/M6GZE9Yq+6626+mthUUKNzKOK/fHtCpaOcrLZZGTyOX8ZFtGVniONFe0HPF5KdV5qbwmyMbdZKnUYQNK37WCwNycceMT6hbNVeyd2Kd9/MUAZbjJzY1Hs7FN6kDyN8RZKz5xUdNKmIXeqoxN13/74AKgq/Ru13AZfUvvgT4gXHlJIEqRKBxTLKyh3V/pr0+GldA145GN88aJ3I+O35U94G6qRm6ynJ4lbhlH0kqYxo47H4x30LJaFpxc4zf4Q60MXZEefikudNdz88yFPtUaldBt/RwA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass
smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net;
dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net;
s=selector1;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
bh=qd5zrKIPT/WlDfmYl7zTX+Fo9OESMLxkod0+FQ9u0TY=;
b=ZNTZ9Ml+nGYRTVgl81IFSRASPBOqfSWsBD/QYZrxLGATvy1t3bOmXbuS1/jc/eFPtkSFFfytKAc9bkBZrzz4YNpAVTznwMH5iIHCbctXoxl/GNHGt8GD9JzVj925cJj8t0WjpmlPk4FWt/6QeyD2qTHk+yAQkFKXTTVUH94WogE=
Received: from DM5PR05MB3388.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:40::18) by
DM5PR05MB3580.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:45::33) with
Microsoft
SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.20.2835.17; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:14:09 +0000
Received: from DM5PR05MB3388.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
([fe80::71ec:50b0:1f06:50e7]) by DM5PR05MB3388.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
([fe80::71ec:50b0:1f06:50e7%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2835.017; Fri, 20 Mar 2020
19:14:09 +0000
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: Eric Gray <eric.gray=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "teas-ns-dt@ietf.org"
<teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>
CC: teas-wg/teas-ns-dt
<reply+AOKQJCVWPIM4VYVOBAM2OD54G3Y57EVBNHHCB45TUE@reply.github.com>
Thread-Topic: Alignment between definition and framework drafts
Thread-Index: AdX+4yrq5Gl/nfzWTAiv2FN8i95lZQACH4cA
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:14:09 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR05MB33883D7907B03D5164999362C7F50@DM5PR05MB3388.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BN8PR15MB264457C81A8BF3CC768A7FEA97F50@BN8PR15MB2644.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN8PR15MB264457C81A8BF3CC768A7FEA97F50@BN8PR15MB2644.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=True;
MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4;
MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Owner=jdrake@juniper.net;
MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-03-20T19:14:07.1048246Z;
MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use
Only; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Application=Microsoft
Azure Information Protection;
MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=ae790958-0422-491d-8ce5-aa4cee8b448f;
MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Extended_MSFT_Method=Automatic
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.3.2.8
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 57483029-9705-42c8-2c36-08d7cd02ddda
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB3580:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB3580D073F13EEC0B0A84971AC7F50@DM5PR05MB3580.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 03484C0ABF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;
SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(366004)(199004)(55016002)(66446008)(7696005)(6506007)(498600001)(66946007)(66556008)(64756008)(2906002)(53546011)(110136005)(8936002)(81166006)(86362001)(8676002)(81156014)(5660300002)(76116006)(66476007)(9686003)(52536014)(33656002)(71200400001)(4326008)(186003)(26005);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3580;
H:DM5PR05MB3388.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate
permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: +6WnLssXoqitsUE9Qvn6BMXoU1FESuBwVUCwWTUC8Gg7G6o0Kz5Hlv4Nz2S8YVZ55w9FrOkZvNUnYlRnCkz86h6aHL05H6HsimNkhpxBuGz8b4QX8CNJTP1ZT0dYSj3PwGqRtgXR8P1cR72vjyXD30ji/b8jmaH6kWFb0NGSd9Lu9RIcob21GI9w2shUPU+n4EQPNQypZg4bnN3c+LNth6yZBl7o6UbfQVB/AVY5aXWo/U2lcUgPPR1uB1JogZeruATqm8/ukVj/ulXZEmNpo8VKZ5LYDmEm2FMEEWm9YNsuKByQHimlfR90TFprZ6/cp/8zFaozVWjucRr8JBIBYpsw0BL/J41wY4/zvRqSjN8wdK5x7eDlYqXODaNdpk7t5jhPHJL9t/CESe4GhdXxHFCOMJA3cfbKSCaM0Eop5yUR09a44QidBT6OELGrVOGy
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 8rrpX01eJg9p8fm6kk2ZyLFuEHfI1hneiyWlddnq9P4Pc/0MfUnSEvEasZAdGmI22mAGXCws9vTz+5fNDkQhQJlkUHiXPBtv2HBnAF8nGoKmGROzfw3BrLMpsnzPlusnUstvvbnyU7qJ2fLg6aK+rQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_DM5PR05MB33883D7907B03D5164999362C7F50DM5PR05MB3388namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 57483029-9705-42c8-2c36-08d7cd02ddda
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Mar 2020 19:14:09.0406 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: n/q5Uikp+rxS8nn6INZW73eqjC4Knhs0t4R8Fsc1QWMwzxLpefDsH8T5tyDRQK741L3KZbyQn2qnjg5uog5JPA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3580
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.645
definitions=2020-03-20_06:2020-03-20,
2020-03-20 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam
score=0 phishscore=0
adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1011
mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0
priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003200075
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas-ns-dt/EDi8AquE9w9b2POTLIBouumvl48>
Subject: Re: [Teas-ns-dt] Alignment between definition and framework drafts
X-BeenThere: teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TEAS Network Slicing Design Team <teas-ns-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas-ns-dt>,
<mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas-ns-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-ns-dt>,
<mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:14:19 -0000
Eric, I like your proposed text. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: Teas-ns-dt <teas-ns-dt-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Eric Gray Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 2:16 PM To: teas-ns-dt@ietf.org Cc: teas-wg/teas-ns-dt <reply+AOKQJCVWPIM4VYVOBAM2OD54G3Y57EVBNHHCB45TUE@reply.github.com> Subject: [Teas-ns-dt] Alignment between definition and framework drafts Folks, The following text was "flagged" in the -00 version of the framework draft submitted to the ID repository as needing some work to align with the definition draft: ** Align with definitions draft ** The users of transport slices are: * The management system or other application that creates and manages them. * The applications and components wishing to use these slices. Transport users are served by the system that can build transport slices, as follows: * A controller takes requests from a management system or other application, which are then communicated via an abstracted northbound interface. This interface transmits data objects that describe the needed transport slices in terms of topology and service level objectives (SLO). * These requests are assumed to be translated by one or more underlying systems, which establish specific transport slice instances, using specific implementation techniques (such as IP and MPLS) implemented on top of the underlying network infrastructure. The reason for this is that definition draft already defines "Customer" and "Transport Slice Controller" - as well as North and South Bound Interfaces. Also, this text has the issue that it seems to describe the interaction between a user and the transport slice instances that they use as taking place in only one direction. I suggest replacing all of the text in question with the following: "The Transport Slice Definition draft <ref> defines the role of a Customer (or User) and a Transport Slice Controller. That draft also defines a TSC Northbound Interface (NBI). "A transport slice user is served by the Transport Slice Controller (TSC), as follows: * The TSC takes requests from a management system or other application, which are then communicated via an NBI. This interface carries data objects the transport slice user provides, describing the needed transport slices in terms of topology, applicable service level objectives (SLO), and any monitoring and reporting requirements that may apply. Note that - in this context - "topology" means what the transport slice connectivity is meant to look like from the users perspective; it may be as simple as a list of mutually (and symmetrically) connected end points, or it may be complicated by details of connection asymmetry, per-connection SLO requirements, etc. * These requests are assumed to be translated by one or more underlying systems, which are used to establish specific transport slice instances on top of an underlying network infrastructure. * The TSC maintains a record of the mapping from user requests to slice instantiations, as needed to allow for subsequent control functions (such as modification or deletion of the requested slices), and as needed for any requested monitoring and reporting functions." -- Eric