IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas-ns-dt] Framework for Transport Slices

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Thu, 09 January 2020 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DE81200F6 for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:12:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tHYtTLxGR4oK for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:12:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A6FC1200F1 for <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:12:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B4155910C347C8C36C0F; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 16:12:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 16:12:48 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:12:43 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: "Rokui, Reza (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <reza.rokui@nokia.com>, "teas-ns-dt@ietf.org" <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: Framework for Transport Slices
Thread-Index: AQHVxlyfIVMVcM2xD0qfSlgK/oEmsKfie7hQ
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 16:12:42 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927CD5D6985@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <E5A4CFEE-846B-44FA-A6D9-E9853880F5E5@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <E5A4CFEE-846B-44FA-A6D9-E9853880F5E5@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.226.81]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927CD5D6985NKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas-ns-dt/ZOvdbpFXH_v146ZrMgcyrKiPbFM>
Subject: Re: [Teas-ns-dt] Framework for Transport Slices
X-BeenThere: teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TEAS Network Slicing Design Team <teas-ns-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas-ns-dt>, <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas-ns-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-ns-dt>, <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 16:13:00 -0000

Hi Reza,

I quickly checked the diff of this document and draft-rokui-5g-transport-slice-00, and found that the major changes are just the draft name and the abstract. Since the previous draft aims provide the clarification and information model of the northbound interface, does this imply that in your opinion the framework would be focusing on the northbound interface and model? Also there are overlapping content with the definition draft which needs to be resolved.

Best regards,
Jie

From: Teas-ns-dt [mailto:teas-ns-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rokui, Reza (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 3:49 AM
To: teas-ns-dt@ietf.org; Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>
Cc: Rokui, Reza (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <reza.rokui@nokia.com>
Subject: [Teas-ns-dt] Framework for Transport Slices

Hi Jari and all,

I hope everyone has a nice break.

As per our agreement last year about the draft for “Framework for Transport Slices”, I have started this draft based on  my original draft presented to TEAS at Montreal IETF.
Please see the attached.

Please note that this is JUST the starting point for this draft. We are in the process of modifying it to make sure it is not 5G centric. Any contribution is welcome.
This draft will be also aligned with “Transport Slice definition” draft.

We can talk about this tomorrow during our DT meeting.

Cheers,
Reza

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email