Re: [Teas-ns-dt] Proposed text for section "Transport Slice Endpoint"

Shunsuke Homma <s.homma0718@gmail.com> Wed, 17 June 2020 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <s.homma0718@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6853A08F8 for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jd4zCUEBnxKx for <teas-ns-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81BCE3A08ED for <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id m81so3242808ioa.1 for <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qYQSYix48cdi1QyVttMnhVictOgnvmFWOoR+FgQQF+g=; b=TDdE8xyRoiClvBuxYBjGf/L9lvq2K1jCivVAe1uTtpCdTZX0sDnnc9Dc5TkmorD2oa RppD9SJNRrzkvPFzGrrMPDhy3HIV+P7QTkXSltuMtEcdA0A3C81u6FhgjiQAfVp4T6KQ pEtQQC7AavEDp8R0xqQcNDWi6tf0RYp+l+Y5wdHuq11VOmBRG1n4ZpuUK8APDSII8MOR hfYH1c+dwyh4cDxNCkZOwW6oXirjMKq8PI8RgLmzxQziLPbanrsO3v8X6ZblBy6L1Z98 DY+ePsPxMMq6RwqeHBkqm5BW1nncSiZC5nlZwHN8DOTd3ndnvCKWO9t4arq84/+3F2Wk DggA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qYQSYix48cdi1QyVttMnhVictOgnvmFWOoR+FgQQF+g=; b=tA7UMxrpWR5s8tZ2tlKLSZ9J27ki/n8eauNa4dmJjb7F28Pge9/hs1O1kbITnAsLdm no7mqunTKqx7av4fM9MB6D9iNh2/6tf1Dw2tZNjRsUuslgLggGieoWmiL241NdkYNoMp l44zBAUlygP6ukPbstPTDXKZJx95iGvM+WeiyAY41yX0zsRPUIsEwuz8+knXdIL3vkPU xVQUd9keCRvCLfYzDftYIrciuwOylTTmp/9YuKaNaLjPXIcVOj7Pl/H+u/QEk+Fo8KBQ ZzRGDWhZYeO6A4LgYCol1AJJfXmMOm7NZXrxNLTDreQSQRWHKJE/RbPGNGPkoQVVeLfP ET2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mv4P2z3e09SSPbU3M5nrRsEysZk6wBGjJJZYLyQI1u6XLVR/f /2hFBccZbLj1rx4m0yDVgT5nnEtV0MAepkyydDY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydWswlT9jJ+90tLNYhVc56MthpoX1WAly17BztRIkowgA4hPJJ3YI1lavG+L+5/QaTkHLRZLlJhFXjjy4tQQ8=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:ccb3:: with SMTP id t19mr32370859jap.20.1592408037832; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7B6758A6-EFDB-433B-A340-8773A39A4312@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <7B6758A6-EFDB-433B-A340-8773A39A4312@nokia.com>
From: Shunsuke Homma <s.homma0718@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:33:46 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGU6MPcejooWxBKv=Krw4pVLWeDm54ZMpd_TjP53eOsm83HurA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Rokui, Reza (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <reza.rokui@nokia.com>
Cc: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "teas-ns-dt@ietf.org" <teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>, Kiran Makhijani <kiranm@futurewei.com>, Kiran Makhijani <kiranmak@gmail.com>, "Luis M. Contreras" <contreras.ietf@gmail.com>, Shunsuke Homma <homma.shunsuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006ebced05a849635e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas-ns-dt/v7sM649aqNpOcyMDcCZcavQRymo>
Subject: Re: [Teas-ns-dt] Proposed text for section "Transport Slice Endpoint"
X-BeenThere: teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TEAS Network Slicing Design Team <teas-ns-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas-ns-dt>, <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas-ns-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas-ns-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-ns-dt>, <mailto:teas-ns-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:34:00 -0000

Hi Reza,

This clarification will be very important, but the texts seem too technical
and specific  as for definition draft.

In my memory, the original texts provided a classification of transport
type endpoints and others (i.e., types of TSRE) for SFC scenarios realized
by SFs and transport slices. Transport slices will be realized by several
traffic forwarding technologies. Transport type endpoints, such as router
and switch, will naturally support forwarding technologies. On the other
hand, some service type endpoints won't have the functionalities, and this
implies that transport slice framework may require SFs to terminate
transport slices with some means. I think this is one of fundamental
requirements and should be described in the definition draft.

Therefore, how about returning the section to original text and bringing
your text into the framework document?

Best regards,

Shunsuke

2020年6月16日(火) 22:51 Rokui, Reza (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <reza.rokui@nokia.com>om>:

> All,
>
>
>
> Following is the modified version of the transport slice endpoint section.
> Please provide your comments.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Reza
>
>
>
>
>
> 4.2.  Transport slice endpoints
>
>
>
>    As discussed in section 3, the transport slice consists of a set of
> connections between multiple endpoints with a specified connectivity type
> and one or more SLOs associated with it.
>
>
>
>    The transport slice endpoints are the logical identifier to identify
> the head-end and tail-end points of a transport slice and to perform the
> forwarding of the user traffic. The characteristics of the transport slice
> endpoints (TSE) are:
>
>
>
>    - They are conceptual point of connection of a network function, device
> or application to the transport slice.
>
>    - They are logical identifier and requested by the customer of
> transport slice during the creation of the transport slice
>
>    - They are associated with (hosted by) exactly one application, device,
> network function (ADN)
>
>    - The cardinality between a TSE and ADN is many:1, i.e. a single device
> or application can host multiple transport slice endpoints
>
>    -  A TSE is identified by its hosted ADN (its IP address, name , ID
> etc), TSE unique identifier, TSE unique name and other data. Non-exhaustive
> list of other data is IP address v4 and v6, VLAN, port, connectivity type
> (i.e. P2P, P2MP, MP2MP) etc.). TDB to add more
>
>
>
>    Note that the concept of the transport slice endpoint is similar to the
> Link Termination Point (LTP) defined in [draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-18]
> and access points (AP) defined in [RFC8453] with an important difference.
> The main difference between them is that both LTP and AP are associated to
> traffic engineering (TE) whereas TSE is not. In other words. the AP (See
> section 2.1 RFC8453) is a common identifier for the TE link and LTP is a
> conceptual point of connection of a TE node to one of the TE links,
> terminated by the TE node (see section 3.5 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-18)
> whereas TSE is a logical head-end and tail-end of the transports slice
> connections. The TE characteristic of the network might be taken into
> consideration during the realization of a transport slice.
>
>
>
>    There is another type of the endpoints called "Transport Slice
> Realization endpoints (TSRE)". These endpoints are allocated  and assigned
> by the network controller during the realization of a transport slice and
> are technology-specific, i.e. they depends on the network technology which
> is used during the transport slice realization. They are identified by a
> hosted node and some associated data. A non-exhaustive list of devices
> containing TSRE are routers, switches, firewalls, WAN, application
> acceleration, Deep Packet Inspection (DPI), server load balancers, NAT44
> [RFC3022], NAT64 [RFC6146], HTTP header enrichment functions, and TCP
> optimizers
>
>
>
> 4.2.1.  Connectivity patterns within Transport Slice
>
>
>
>    The transport slices are a set of connections among the set of
>  endpoints.  These connections can be point to point (P2P), point to
>
>    multipoint (P2MP), multi-point to point (MP2P), or multi-point to
>  multi-point (MP2MP) based on the connectivity type requested by the
> customer.
>
>
>
>
>