[Teas] Re: 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls-09 (*one* week)

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Dear Authors,
As far as I understand, the second WG LC is closed now. I am looking
forward to hearing from you about the comment below.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 6:50 AM Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Dear Authors and the WG,
> thank you for your work on this document. One more comment (I've sent it
> on the earlier WG LC thread) to share:
>
>    - After a discussion with my colleagues, I found Figure 6 confusing,
>    particularly the part that reflects the relationship between 5G NSO, TN
>    Orchestration, and systems that it contains, i.e., Customer Site
>    Orchestration and RFC 9543 NSC. Some of us interpreted that the
>    down-looking pitchfork indicates that 5G NSO communicates directly with the
>    components of the TN Orchestration. In contrast, others assumed that the
>    demultiplexing of communications from 5G NSO is the function of the TN
>    Orchestration. Although we understand that the figure presents an example,
>    it seems like it can be made more straightforward since the scope of the
>    document is the interactions between RFC 9543 NSC and the Provider Network.
>    Thus, I have two suggestions, and each can clarify Figure 6 and help a
>    reader:
>       - Reduce Figure 6 to RFC 9543 NSC and the Provider Network;
>       - Alternatively, remove the pitchfork stopping down-looking arrow
>       from 5G NSO at the TN Orchestration (how the TN Orchestration demultiplexes
>       that flow to Customer Site Orchestration and RFC 9543 NSC is outside the
>       scope of the document).
>
> I appreciate your consideration.
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:28 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> This starts the 2nd working group last call on
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls/
>>
>> Please note that the previous last call was for version 4 of the document
>> and several changes have been made to the document since then. The changes
>> have been discussed on the list and a summary presented during the WG
>> session in IETF 120.
>>
>> As this is a 2nd last call that is primarily focused on changes since
>> the previous last call, it closes in *one" week. The working group last
>> call ends on August 28th, 2024. Please send your comments to the working
>> group mailing list.
>>
>> A diff (v4-v9) can be found at:
>>
>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls-04&url2=draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls-09&difftype=--html
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Pavan and Oscar
>> ps: The following comment from Greg will be considered as part of this
>> 2nd LC -
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Pr7hvoB_RS9ZgGIRGEdCf2rn4bE/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Teas mailing list -- [e-mail]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>
>