Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Mon, 14 January 2019 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08A2130FF0; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 02:58:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7zsktrKbuVzu; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 02:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1756F130FEA; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 02:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id w7so9285856pgp.13; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 02:58:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UfLRWAd8NdkgM835nfDrfivwsPktFY2/7Wkw4ocnrqY=; b=Ne73bQVVaYPJUFi+Rw7abqI8Klec554E/DsTzKxllvsPt9zQ6nFmS5qPox9ovfRONs dWltVPId3eZCsZFJm0DzyvF8zFMxyPPJz7KgspvgSNAKXvM45LNGeQA4BQcDqHvJRZyU Ky+nEQKCxPSjKMRKJPF6tNTgH/ISySalOeO+B2WnzG1T4gqZLkfFy9HfCL0CmFAkOszf UFlzIzaKjNVgaHfGdw47Nphbt4J6YGUmttE0dMxVrDAk9JG0NBKiGNfoQdmaFGmMO+M4 bFgW2eE1AXms6DmK8SEIp7Ejtci3FAOT5kJYIGXUQDYUeAiCnYtcTRcmBYT+uqovrO1E HCXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UfLRWAd8NdkgM835nfDrfivwsPktFY2/7Wkw4ocnrqY=; b=ehjaUdSyh9pa9xzGUafYMEAGWWV62HlajRPzWZQYT19DPIiLCTyty3zmSkuky1eDI4 J71syHWKbb5uc41NUqv0isTZfp2JJCS6X3Un72fkEKp24jxFKIB9b84o4/vNL3x1vKpJ 3hhw1PHDg8RUOTc/QRxPqnAdf5BzOgsyK3s2TCjYx4sQNhbSA+U8p5XPOzFTSMuehDXJ 4JCai1YCXamErwXinmDxUgTe+ndy5fW3pwi1gM7IEZ/f73wOtCnkxXSFpB6Czr4BPsDS DRHa5XBPuchpnkypF15h0CfiTPQ0Id7wErjhjAQQf3eREs/aqHoQh+hMUjcW/PDZVIe1 LvUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeAim+ODS/U7p/kABF3v/zIh3IQn6IV1nb2QUtm2AvnbfHoTNxB 9eUBqX2MtYqo6204Igf+wQLcSqOLYPWlCbI2eZ3CJ4hD
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6YbmTB4qj1t/VWptoMy2WnIKkQ0wG99k6zDoZGcIOeChJf00/y/CKX4UuBD8ngV/1UZFWCMF0IG50CXg9Sz68=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:4665:: with SMTP id v37mr12432951pgk.425.1547463487494; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 02:58:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+YzgTvF_dL6PehuA9cYrw9-zF9rCu-bwA0PSbY2Pg+GgwRJYQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTvF_dL6PehuA9cYrw9-zF9rCu-bwA0PSbY2Pg+GgwRJYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 05:58:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTuTCD518aGovSiaR3Mx7H7w+oVXZGFbRxcnJgEYjNOPcQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000799cb2057f68eba5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/-iDyaFVnoX5C9GE2-LIc4RnZh7Y>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 10:58:10 -0000

All,
    The WG poll is closed. The concerns raised about the utility of this
extension are duly noted and are expected to get debated further as the
document progresses through the WG process. Based on the discussion so far,
the chairs don't see a good reason to not support this signaling extension.

Authors,
    Please republish draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-00 as
draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-00 with only the date and file name
changed.

- Pavan and Lou

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:07 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>;
wrote:

> All,
>
> This is start of a *three* week poll on making
> draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp a TEAS working group document.
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
> document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
> like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
>
> The poll ends Jan 8th 2019 (extra week to account for the holidays).
>
> Thanks,
> Pavan and Lou
>