Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework-10

KwangKoog Lee <kwangkooglee@gmail.com> Wed, 01 November 2017 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <kwangkooglee@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1398713F87F; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V_GIEfwsK9EX; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x236.google.com (mail-pg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 265CA13F56A; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id j3so2107095pga.1; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 06:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qg7WesKAOuUv8w0AUmpineFZIfG52TWm4BeM0B/0cGE=; b=bZysJntA2zHtjeWpZoPUJbglOlfEpt52GznB0qwUjBaHk/pKtQel6ekZ6ihpNbhdui KJhxxzFdLmdz1RZQycwZKEPz5MbgJuS9iyDwolNRNOf/n4X9s7Sbvvds8p8EfcZP4iFc eENSWizZTwEvPRrPg6x20K8Xcos32pFJDqjaBwtmYumg7mMnKA/zYt58get80Kkw6ym5 6pvjR/tSBGbqsgwWy1Sro4TBEPTc81wFR7nn82a44ypzWCKGIbcbvNOx3gZC496HhQiV uhirV0LiuWFxWF4RPPZ92Seb+k+LFAQ/XcDM+4Gwq0qN++Xs+LpA7TdOEhcvNnJX0BI1 Pikg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qg7WesKAOuUv8w0AUmpineFZIfG52TWm4BeM0B/0cGE=; b=qT09xod4FHa1TK4RXvEcUeL+fkZxBIFQTbMLEygB4Ql/En4cxOv+7IlK7isVCX+sVb AbjWDx8gc4CaaKGNGn7KJEPZBLRQ1nW1xkTLEGdTdHHzyVcI2++odQfkLnXmCgo20t3I xP74AWj2NanYTa7lzw42sGumiPxtJGKrlO5ZYTALVjZCkRGCFlFVfNN3UEKNBYMhncGG tAo7bh6+h2Q7PwArHZPktegfcoX/JVbGWdKhumGRzOWaDzkPHfFbllin750RRdTJUKQA AnIafIwtfQvboXL2d8KIjyInHVxFiLnpxejVtQULu5moiqCuefgzALXW2R/dwaH+MYjf 7+TA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVQoWyC/iGE8M4ZnoidB7rzNT4fRcZ1JoNUHEqxf8dDLCFBeTe6 e0CuUzw3bg63nZ40B4mptcvAcxsuOpOrvX43SRo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RKL3Kmx2AfkD3ROeY02me9r9sXArpR6DoxYSTXOTpHp21QeyKOWhL8ZVWMb6FfV1KoQxZcvuVfA7J4CfwNQ8o=
X-Received: by 10.99.149.66 with SMTP id t2mr6478041pgn.105.1509542098626; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 06:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.241.130 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.241.130 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACE+VPGAT31ppiR4muzmxAuh5haW2142bBMj6BRJiPUJHNznHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+YzgTunGbZzMOvS9a5fMST2LLk-GzU4mm35aU2Kkr992DLUWQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACE+VPGAT31ppiR4muzmxAuh5haW2142bBMj6BRJiPUJHNznHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: KwangKoog Lee <kwangkooglee@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:14:57 +0900
Message-ID: <CACE+VPGBHjbtcJ8XmuJKJ16F1wpwf+8Un0jrU9r01aokjAGypg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com, Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>, Khuzema Pithewan <kpithewan@infinera.com>, "Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)" <michael.scharf@nokia.com>, Luyuan Fang <luyuanf@gmail.com>, diego@tid.es, "Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT)" <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>, d.king@lancaster.ac.uk, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1b3ace8fef10055ceba82a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/-wOSW33BWmgHdhesNFIoTa4Uj40>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework-10
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:15:01 -0000

Hi.

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Kwang-koog Lee

2017. 10. 28. 오전 6:28에 "Vishnu Pavan Beeram" <vishnupavan@gmail.com>님이 작성:

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas