Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp

"Hejia (Jia)" <hejia@huawei.com> Wed, 09 January 2019 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <hejia@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777DA12D7EA; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 18:38:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.772
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.772 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RAS6o_g1HnBC; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 18:38:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E78212008A; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 18:38:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8D13DB51FF5F1443F1F6; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 02:38:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.55) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 02:38:48 +0000
Received: from lhreml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.55) by lhreml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 02:38:47 +0000
Received: from DGGEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.42) by lhreml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 02:38:47 +0000
Received: from DGGEMA523-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.90]) by DGGEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.42]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:38:44 +0800
From: "Hejia (Jia)" <hejia@huawei.com>
To: "Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <dieter.beller@nokia.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp
Thread-Index: AQHUltsK8H6OSOGRzUepWvwob6/NcKWkujyAgAGg71I=
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 02:38:44 +0000
Message-ID: 7C623B17-0B01-48B9-A522-8603DB7E9AB4
References: <CA+YzgTvF_dL6PehuA9cYrw9-zF9rCu-bwA0PSbY2Pg+GgwRJYQ@mail.gmail.com>, <86c8f706-f372-dc5e-c523-8bc0632dda9b@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <86c8f706-f372-dc5e-c523-8bc0632dda9b@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7C623B170B0148B9A5228603DB7E9AB4_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/0BnMIs-Lf5MdGW8hV2iv2p3HR3Y>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 02:38:52 -0000

Hi Dieter,

SMP standard is published as G.808.3 by ITU-T SG15. As far as I know, there are implementations in the industry. Besides, the draft is not to addess interoperability issue, but rather to define a new protection type that is used in the provisioning of primary and secondary LSPs in the SMP case.

B.R.
Jia
发件人:Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart) <dieter.beller@nokia.com>
收件人:Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>;TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
抄 送:TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
时间:2019-01-08 17:46:54
主 题:Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp

Hi Pavan, Lou, all,

Happy New Year!

Here's my reply to the poll: no/do not support

I have doubts whether interoperable SMP implementations are existing today in the data plane that justify the definition of GMPLS signaling extensions to support SMP.


Thanks,
Dieter


On 18.12.2018 15:07, Vishnu Pavan Beeram wrote:
All,

This is start of a *three* week poll on making
draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp a TEAS working group document.
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends Jan 8th 2019 (extra week to account for the holidays).

Thanks,
Pavan and Lou



_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas