Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording-09

Matt Hartley <mhartley.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 11 November 2019 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC90A120AED; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:48:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ZFD8_2lmgF7; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92BAD120AEE; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id c22so200574wmd.1; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:48:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7K/04oUNljr2RhMijbP+6u/nyQpjD0tEdaesdoWCrJE=; b=k5AtxWnsesPyAK5Bw9Q0GlP6AdnBpHulhcFzW6W9YR3d9qOdnaNDaQtxSOFM/9fkTz baniWAVt0c1c/WUg7u3QeZjcT+s3nQg7h2LDXwUeGecnPndWEPUXpwMMLA7j4UGDs9rb QQWHmNzwDI/cR96G6VBMhgBJVFJwC6zu+H/nUZC8gQy7MXPMnQJNkgK2pP/5AoTVmYq9 cuGqyMfiMh4E3kBl/exOngQa8BxOe3HWV2IDDDXcF/jYTLJTGUUmoLNpVZfIZTs6HqvR 3Hr1xyqQqPfBv4JqqsJakgKivRLsw+DnvjPQu15klFpsgCkEE3EtCVLjifYmvI6/YFWg oHGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7K/04oUNljr2RhMijbP+6u/nyQpjD0tEdaesdoWCrJE=; b=b3xswB9HZAAhxZrdJ5p+MlMO0vk69mVukXXeRhTkdiQXQv36QpEZfclR2oKaskjFPe mQsGpG1ppDdAwdy0BJ762VUMd4vJfJE0M1Bew1J/bIyflcI+WlLToNXBcG53IeBy6z76 qK8J06VO3k8n7bfZ3/p0n2dj6YlSr/y0whDVZUOMBTPkdDbVxzeqQ0Q6W6OvOB/LtEKP sqp2VifS779IUTxZy8BDhkebRl0JiLYS4RSYzv5yX70rp8kDL6vdiwYSl5xmamwTgOxj Uw9NStaIRZDTjkSf+LznhDt6pYARMAU+cRyqMT9OOGt2QeNJlXAsdmfxDnyW9EsazFPA lkeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWoplkvNqE11LLvZoiCYPbQKhO42hZ4LWQ9/ywbRgbCzwbuXFZv x+Y/kCldwiGoAKHWqPscDtMyt5D3eeAH+NSUjpQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzkvkEzppcjjl74Hv8hMVVigsmXse+I6hTgrlf3K8xR8og+kKX6ykmvdzB+h4wXrkvtiyKMOlC8X5xbQ6/W1YY=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e157:: with SMTP id y84mr148074wmg.59.1573494530088; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:48:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+YzgTuuUf6YWr+VCAW1Wj6Xoj4sFghMGzNa+80b4GQcQ_OjSA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTuuUf6YWr+VCAW1Wj6Xoj4sFghMGzNa+80b4GQcQ_OjSA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Hartley <mhartley.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 12:48:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKfnWBiQQ7oQpUG9JeZyujKKoYg_vM6nqhQQLwcShFQNeETpAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, cfilsfil@cisco.com, ke-kumaki@kddi.com, Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "Sajal Agarwal (sajaagar)" <sajaagar@cisco.com>, swallow.ietf@gmail.com, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000085a220059715be20"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/0Cfs27nwKGIWHbWQQIA7JchUSek>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording-09
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 17:48:57 -0000

I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Cheers

Matt

On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 9:37 PM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> TEAS WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>